2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1699(99)00068-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
142
1
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
142
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results shown so far are based on a VI that is calculated in a similar manner as the NDVI but using information from the blue and green spectral range. Visible light VIs, such as the NGRDI, are often used to characterize vegetation if NIR information is lacking (Pérez et al 2000; Meyer and Neto 2008; Raymond et al 2005). Due to their low costs and low weight, consumer-grade true colour (RGB) digital cameras are particularly suitable for assessing green vegetation using UAS-based imaging systems (Torres-Sánchez et al 2014; Saberioon et al 2014; Hoffmann et al 2016a; Goodbody et al 2017; Jannoura et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results shown so far are based on a VI that is calculated in a similar manner as the NDVI but using information from the blue and green spectral range. Visible light VIs, such as the NGRDI, are often used to characterize vegetation if NIR information is lacking (Pérez et al 2000; Meyer and Neto 2008; Raymond et al 2005). Due to their low costs and low weight, consumer-grade true colour (RGB) digital cameras are particularly suitable for assessing green vegetation using UAS-based imaging systems (Torres-Sánchez et al 2014; Saberioon et al 2014; Hoffmann et al 2016a; Goodbody et al 2017; Jannoura et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereto, two VIs were derived from the RGB orthomosaics. First, the Normalized Green-Red Difference Index (NGRDI) given in Equation (1) expresses the difference between the green and red bands divided by their sum (Pérez et al 2000). At our study site, the discrimination between living green and dried dead vegetation, which was used for the determination of the fraction of green vegetation ( f g ) in the TSEB model, was important since f g was very heterogeneous over the field and changed in between flights because farmers were mowing the fields.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine vision is successfully used to recognize weeds from soil with the goal of eliminating weeds between the rows or between widely spaced individual crop plants (Perez et al, 2000;Tillett et al, 2001;Onyango and Marchant, 2003), but it is still a difficult task to recognize weeds within the rows, particularly in the case of carrots. Indeed carrots are densely sown, they do not follow a regular sowing pattern and present high variability in size and shape due to different development stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D shape features have been used to detect broad-leaved weeds in cereal crops [16], to allow a rover to classify the shape and other geologic characteristics of rocks [9], to investigate the suitability of an imaging system to measure shape of particles [4] and for detection and classification of rocks [18]. A 3D feature called visibility ratio have been used to classify the visibility of rocks in piles [19].…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%