2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2007.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of the most efficient wavelength bands for discriminating weeds from crop

Abstract: The aim of this study was to select the best combination of filters for detecting various weed species located within carrot rows. In-field images were taken under artificial lighting with a multispectral device consisting of a black and white camera coupled with a rotating wheel holding 22 interference filters in the VIS-NIR domain. Measurements were performed over a period of 19 days, starting 1 week after crop emergence (early weeding can increase yields) and seven different weeds species were considered. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to date, there are many studies on identification of weeds from crops using the sensitive spectral bands with encouraging results. However, the identification accuracy is low in cases when the spectral difference between the crop and the weed is not obvious, or the reflection of leaves is affected by factors of water content, plant disease, and growth stage [9][10][11][12][13]. Therefore, to more effectively discriminate weeds from crops, the combination of multiple features, such as the combination of shape and textural, shape and spectral, and spectral and textural features, should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date, there are many studies on identification of weeds from crops using the sensitive spectral bands with encouraging results. However, the identification accuracy is low in cases when the spectral difference between the crop and the weed is not obvious, or the reflection of leaves is affected by factors of water content, plant disease, and growth stage [9][10][11][12][13]. Therefore, to more effectively discriminate weeds from crops, the combination of multiple features, such as the combination of shape and textural, shape and spectral, and spectral and textural features, should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best discrimination was obtained using a combination of the logarithmic transformation and PLS-LDA method . Borregaard et al (2000) and Piron et al (2008) estimated the effective wavelengths for discriminating carrots from weeds, and potatoes from various weed leaves, under artificial lighting.…”
Section: Crop Plant and Weed Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multispectral acquisition device comprised a black and white camera (C-cam BCI 5 1.3 megapixels) coupled with a filter wheel holding 22 interference filters covering the visible and near infrared spectrum (400-1000 nm approximately) (Piron et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Multispectral and Stereoscopic Acquisition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Piron et al (2008a), it was shown that the best combination of filters for detecting various weed species located within carrot rows were respectively centered on 450, 550 and 700 nm.…”
Section: Combination Of Multispectral and Stereoscopic Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation