2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/9706321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Microencapsulated Islet Transplantation and Revascularization of Aortorenal Bypass in a Diabetic Nephropathy Rat Model

Abstract: Objective. Revascularization of aortorenal bypass is a preferred technique for renal artery stenosis (RAS) in diabetic nephropathy (DN) patients. Restenosis of graft vessels also should be considered in patients lacking good control of blood glucose. In this study, we explored a combined strategy to prevent the recurrence of RAS in the DN rat model. Methods. A model of DN was established by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin. Rats were divided into 4 groups: SR group, MIT group, Com group, and the unt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total we utilized 75 rats that were randomized into 5 groups (n=15/group): Control rats that were fed regular food and water without treatment (Group A); an untreated model group in which DN was established based on prior approaches [ 63 ], with rats being maintained on a high-far high-sugar diet for 8 additional weeks without any treatment (Group B); a CTLA-4-Ig group in which DN was established as above, and rats were fed a high-fat high-sugar diet for 8 weeks during which time they were intravenously administered 0.5 mg/kg CTLA-4-Ig per week via tail vein injection (Group C); A microbubble exposure group in which DN was established as above, rats were maintained on a high-fat high-sugar diet for 8 weeks during which they SonoVue tail vein injections (1 ml/kg/week) with simultaneous ultrasound exposure to the kidneys (Group D); A combination CTLA-4-Ig + ultrasound microbubble exposition group wherein rats were treated as in Group D, but were injected with both CTLA-4-Ig (0.5 mg/kg/w) and SonoVue (1 ml/kg/w) while undergoing ultrasound exposure (Group E). The rats’ kidneys were exposed to 1 MHz ultrasound waves for 4 minutes per exposure twice per week with the following settings: 100 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 1.5 W/cm 2 output intensity, 0.2 MPa peak negative acoustic pressure and 60% duty cycle [ 64 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total we utilized 75 rats that were randomized into 5 groups (n=15/group): Control rats that were fed regular food and water without treatment (Group A); an untreated model group in which DN was established based on prior approaches [ 63 ], with rats being maintained on a high-far high-sugar diet for 8 additional weeks without any treatment (Group B); a CTLA-4-Ig group in which DN was established as above, and rats were fed a high-fat high-sugar diet for 8 weeks during which time they were intravenously administered 0.5 mg/kg CTLA-4-Ig per week via tail vein injection (Group C); A microbubble exposure group in which DN was established as above, rats were maintained on a high-fat high-sugar diet for 8 weeks during which they SonoVue tail vein injections (1 ml/kg/week) with simultaneous ultrasound exposure to the kidneys (Group D); A combination CTLA-4-Ig + ultrasound microbubble exposition group wherein rats were treated as in Group D, but were injected with both CTLA-4-Ig (0.5 mg/kg/w) and SonoVue (1 ml/kg/w) while undergoing ultrasound exposure (Group E). The rats’ kidneys were exposed to 1 MHz ultrasound waves for 4 minutes per exposure twice per week with the following settings: 100 Hz pulse repetition frequency, 1.5 W/cm 2 output intensity, 0.2 MPa peak negative acoustic pressure and 60% duty cycle [ 64 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%