2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining the Heatpipe Reformer technology with hydrogen-intensified methanation for production of synthetic natural gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The HPR technology selected is the one developed primarily at TU Munich, Germany, and continuous operation has been demonstrated at a scale of 500 kW, while the integration of this gasifier in a synthetic natural gas chain has been demonstrated at a scale of 100 kW at the Chair of Energy Process Engineering at FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. 21,22 The HPR gasifier is an indirectly heated gasifier that consists of two separated fluidized beds: the gasification reactor and the combustion reactor (see Figure 2a). Wood is gasified with steam in the gasifier, which is operated at high pressure (feasible upper limit 10 bar).…”
Section: Hydrogen Production Via Woody Biomass Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HPR technology selected is the one developed primarily at TU Munich, Germany, and continuous operation has been demonstrated at a scale of 500 kW, while the integration of this gasifier in a synthetic natural gas chain has been demonstrated at a scale of 100 kW at the Chair of Energy Process Engineering at FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. 21,22 The HPR gasifier is an indirectly heated gasifier that consists of two separated fluidized beds: the gasification reactor and the combustion reactor (see Figure 2a). Wood is gasified with steam in the gasifier, which is operated at high pressure (feasible upper limit 10 bar).…”
Section: Hydrogen Production Via Woody Biomass Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the HPR we assume that 33 % of the total biomass input is combusted in the combustion chamber. [21][22][23] While for the oxySER we assume that 63 mol% of the carbon present in the biomass is burnt in the combustor. 36,37 The amount of steam needed as reactant is subtracted by the amount of process steam co-produced; whereas the remaining process steam is expanded in the turbine section.…”
Section: Hpr and Oxyser Gasifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many recent studies and projects are studying the possibility of improving this technology or simplifying the process itself to make it competitive. For instance, Neubert et al in [68] proposes a new catalytic methanation reactor with heat pipe integration into a structured reactor, that can be considered suitable alternatives to classical reactors for CO 2 methanation due its efficient temperature control; Leimert et al in [69] suggests the combination of heat pipe reformer biomass gasification process with hydrogen intensified methanation. Further studies on the production of methane from biomass are reported in [70][71][72], as well as from COG in [73].…”
Section: Integration Of Hydrogen Production With Methane and Methanol Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, any additional input hydrogen is not consumed in the process and remains unexploited in the product gases [75]. Table 2 shows the reaction equations for the methane and methanol syntheses from CO and CO 2 [69,76]. [69,76].…”
Section: Integration Of Hydrogen Production With Methane and Methanol Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation