2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.167401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Structure and dynamics of liquid water on rutile TiO2(110)”

Abstract: Liu and co-workers [Phys. Rev. B 82, 161415 (2010)] discussed the long-standing debate regarding whether H 2 O molecules on the defect-free (110) surface of rutile (α-TiO 2) sorb associatively, or there is dissociation of some or all first-layer water to produce hydroxyl surface sites. They conducted static density functional theory (DFT) and DFT molecular dynamics (DFT-MD) investigations using a range of cell configurations and functionals. We have reproduced their static DFT calculations of the influence of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43,44,50 Here, we find two (hard) layers closest to the surface and one soft outer layer, in good agreement with previous studies. 52,105 On rutile (001), there are fourth and fifth ordered water layers (L 4 , L 5 ) at 6 and 8 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Hard and Soft Hydration Layerssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…43,44,50 Here, we find two (hard) layers closest to the surface and one soft outer layer, in good agreement with previous studies. 52,105 On rutile (001), there are fourth and fifth ordered water layers (L 4 , L 5 ) at 6 and 8 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Hard and Soft Hydration Layerssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Nguyen et al [36] have improved the DFT treatment of hematite-water interfaces by use of PBE+U. In many cases, very low energy barriers were found for water dissociation on hematite-001 surfaces, confirming experimental reports of widespread room-temperature dissociation of water on hematite-001 [36]; this is in some contrast to the debate as to the dominance of physical or chemical water adsorption on rutile-110 at room temperature [37][38][39]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no AIMD study of the water-hematite interface, which is needed to capture the rich physic-complexity of roomtemperature chemical adsorption and the dynamical properties of the surface hematite layers, along with those of the water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…TH and BH are still forming strong H-bonds, as is evident from the broad stretching bands measured and reproduced by the simulation in this range ( Figure 3D; blue line), but these bonds are predominantly with L 2 H 2 O through L 1 −L 2 interlayer interactions ( Figure 1A). Likewise, L 1 H 2 O dissociation still occurs, but via proton transfers from TW to L 2 to BO, rather than directly from TW to BO, 24 leading to an average state of 60% L 1 dissociation in the full sample (for comparison, the fully hydrated α-TiO 2 (110) surface has been reported to exhibit 0−30% L 1 dissociation [23][24][25]27,45 ). The INS spectrum contains no spatial information, but we find from the simulations that the lower energy end of the O−H stretching band is populated by species with H-bonds formed between L 1 and L 2 , while the upper end is populated by the H 2 O molecules in L 3 (see text in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The degree of dissociation of L 1 corresponds to a dynamic equilibrium driven by proton transfers between the associated and dissociated configurations, which depends on temperature, hydration level, 24 and pH, if liquid water is present. 25 Upon further hydration, a second (L 2 ) and third layer (L 3 ) will form whose structure depends on the degree of dissociation of L 1 . These layers are defined by distinct minima in the axial density profile of oxygen atoms perpendicular to the surface derived from our previous results, 36,37,43 and constitute 1 ML in L 1 , ∼1.7 ML in L 2 , and ∼1.3 ML in L 3 per Sn 2 O 4 (110) surface unit area.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%