2021
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communal collective narcissism

Abstract: Objectives We aimed to introduce, validate, and showcase the utility of a new construct: communal collective narcissism. Method We conducted four studies, in which we developed a new scale for communal collective narcissism (Study 1, N = 856), tested the construct's unique predictions (Study 2, N = 276), examined its social relevance (Study 3, N = 250), and assessed its implications for intergroup outcomes (Study 4, N = 664). Results In Study 1, we verified the structural soundness of the Communal Collective N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, we found independent effects of religiosity and national narcissism on prejudice, even in such a cultural context. The Polish cultural context is also vital for distinguishing agentic and communal collective narcissism (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2021). Although we predicted a slightly different relationship between agentic and communal collective narcissism with prejudice and numinous constructs, we analyzed these both forms as one broad phenomenon due to a strong positive correlation between these two forms of national narcissism in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, we found independent effects of religiosity and national narcissism on prejudice, even in such a cultural context. The Polish cultural context is also vital for distinguishing agentic and communal collective narcissism (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2021). Although we predicted a slightly different relationship between agentic and communal collective narcissism with prejudice and numinous constructs, we analyzed these both forms as one broad phenomenon due to a strong positive correlation between these two forms of national narcissism in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective narcissism was measured (Wave 1) with the (9 items) Agentic Collective Narcissism Scale (Golec de Zavala et al, 2009) and the (7 items) Collective Communal Narcissism Inventory (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2020, 2021). Participants were asked how much they agreed (1 = definitely disagree ; 7 = definitely agree ) with statements for the former (e.g., “I wish other groups would more quickly recognize authority of my group”) and the latter (e.g., “My group is extraordinarily friendly toward other groups.”); we removed one item (i.e., “If my group had more to say, the world would be a better place.”) from the former to reduce redundancy and potential multicollinearity with an item from the latter (i.e., “My group will make the world a better place.”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assessed intergroup prosocialness (Wave 3) by adapting to Poland and for COVID-19 a scenario-based measure assessing individual differences in intention to help tsunami victims (Vollhardt & Staub, 2011). Participants read a short description about the current situation in Italy (see the supplemental material) and then responded to four questions (e.g., "The Polish government has a responsibility to help Italy") corresponding to four of the six items of the original scale but replacing "US" with "Poland" (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2021). We excluded one item referring to helping Poles in Italy because it was irrelevant to outgroup helping.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, collective narcissism is related to the derogation of others when narcissists are confronted with unfavorable feedback about their ingroup (Golec de Zavala et al, 2016). Yet this effect is moderated by the way people enhance their group (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%