Community flood resilience assessment frameworks: a review

Bulti, Dejene Tesema; Girma, Birhanu; Megento, Tebarek Lika

doi:10.1007/s42452-019-1731-6

Cited by 32 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the basis of the review, the existing research on resilience assessment frameworks generally presents an analysis of the state of the art on definition and assessment frameworks of resilience [6,51,58,60], as well as the development and comparison of resilience measurement dimensions, metrics, and approaches [2,39,43]. In comparison, studies on the implementation of resilience assessment frameworks are limited.…”

Section: Implementation Of Resilience Assessment Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In line with the grown concern of enhancing and managing CI resilience, the issue of measuring resilience has become a primary concern. Thus, as a basic method and operational tool to measure CI resilience, resilience assessment framework has captured considerable research attention in recent years [8,9,[39][40][41]. The existing literature shows that resilience assessment framework must consist of several dimensions and indicators to comprehensively and effectively measure resilience [42,43].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Serfilippi and Ramnath [58] reviewed resilience measurement and conceptual frameworks, which developed a series of critical indicators to measure community resilience. Examining 17 resilience assessment frameworks, Bulti [39] analyzed community resilience measurement tools in flood disaster management and defined seven evaluation criteria considering the multifaceted nature of resilience. Similarly, Almutairi et al [59] provided a synthetical review of resilience frameworks for disaster risk management in coastal communities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Resilience Assessment Frameworks of Critical Infrastructures: State-of-the-Art Review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the past two decades, critical infrastructures (CIs) faced a growing number of challenges worldwide due to natural disasters and other disruptive events. To respond to and handle these disasters and disruptive events, the concept of resilience was introduced to CIs. Particularly, many institutions and scholars developed various types of frameworks to assess and enhance CI resilience. The purpose of this paper is to review the resilience assessment frameworks of the CIs proposed by quality papers published in the past decade, determine and analyze the common dimensions and the key indicators of resilience assessment frameworks of CIs, and propose possible opportunities for future research. To achieve these goals, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, which identified 24 resilience assessment frameworks from 24 quality papers. This paper contributes to the current body of resilience research by identifying the common dimensions and the key indicators of the resilience assessment frameworks proposed for CIs. In addition, this paper is beneficial to the practice, because it provides a comprehensive view of the resilience assessment frameworks of CIs from the perspective of implementation, and the indicators are pragmatic and actionable in practice.

show abstract

Section: Implementation Of Resilience Assessment Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Resilience Assessment Frameworks of Critical Infrastructures: State-of-the-Art Review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, the power distribution infrastructure systems by Kim et al [85]. More prior studies focused on regional research of community resilience [86,87]. However, there is lack of a set of systematic indicator systems for assessing the community resilience.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scenario-Based Comprehensive Assessment for Community Resilience Adapted to Fire Following an Earthquake, Implementing the Analytic Network Process and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enriched Evaluation II Techniques

Chen

Yan

et al. 2021

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Natural hazards bring significant influences on and socioeconomic loss to cities and communities. Historic events show that fire following earthquake (FFE) is the most influential uncertain disturbance on the urban infrastructure system. Under the FFE scenario, the concept of resilience is widely implemented to make up the shortcomings derived from the traditional disaster management methodology. Resilient cities and communities are required to improve the systemic performance in responding to the FFE. To fulfill these goals, measuring community resilience is an essential work for municipal policy makers. Therefore, this study conducted a comprehensive assessment on community resilience adapted to the FFE scenario. The systematic literature review (SLR) was employed to identify the indicators, and the analytic network process (ANP) technique was implemented to determine their weights. 20 indicators were extracted, and 4 communities that encountered FFE in China were selected for the empirical analysis. Thereafter, the preference ranking organization method for enriched evaluation (PROMETHEE) II technique was selected through using the multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods selection framework to fulfill the comprehensive assessment. The results were discussed and demonstrated with graphical analysis for interactive aid (GAIA) technique. The findings revealed that the G Community won the highest score and had the strongest performance. However, H Community had the lowest score and the weakest performance. The proposed comprehensive methods could benefit the decision-makers and the policy executors achieving the community resilience adapted to the FFE scenario by improving the effective indicators.

show abstract

“…Despite over two decades of research on urban resilience assessment, there is still no study mapping the knowledge structure and research development trends. There are some review papers that provide information related to either single sectors such as energy [5], transportation [6], street networks [7], and water [8], or single types of stressors such flooding [9]. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive reviews that cover different sectors and stressors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urban Resilience Assessment: Mapping Knowledge Structure and Trends

Sharifi

2020

Sustainability

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature on urban resilience assessment has grown rapidly over the past two decades. This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the state of knowledge on urban resilience assessment through mapping the knowledge domain and highlighting emerging trends during different periods. The objects of study were 420 papers published in the Web of Science from 1998 to 2020. Science mapping was done using VOSviewer and CiteSpace, two widely known software tools for bibliometrics analysis and scientometric visualization. The results show that research published on urban resilience assessment was very limited and fragmented until 2009, and the focus has mainly been on risk mitigation and vulnerability assessment. The intellectual base grew between 2010 and 2014, when a paradigm shift from approaches based on robustness and reliability toward more adaptation-oriented approaches occurred. Finally, the annual publication trends have grown rapidly over the past five years and there has been more emphasis on climate change adaptation and flood resilience. Overall, in terms of dimensional focus, more attention has been paid to infrastructural, institutional, and environmental aspects at the expense of social and economic dimensions. In addition to information on thematic focus and evolution, this paper also provides other bibliometrics information on the influential authors, institutions, journals, and publications that lay the foundation of the field and can be used by various interested groups as points of reference to gain better knowledge about the structure and thematic evolution of urban resilience assessment. The paper concludes by highlighting gaps and making some recommendations for future improvement of the field. Major gaps are related to assessing resilience against socio-economic and health risks (e.g., economic recession and pandemics such as COVID-19).

show abstract

Community flood resilience assessment frameworks: a review

Cited by 32 publications

References 42 publications

Resilience Assessment Frameworks of Critical Infrastructures: State-of-the-Art Review

Resilience Assessment Frameworks of Critical Infrastructures: State-of-the-Art Review

Scenario-Based Comprehensive Assessment for Community Resilience Adapted to Fire Following an Earthquake, Implementing the Analytic Network Process and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enriched Evaluation II Techniques

Urban Resilience Assessment: Mapping Knowledge Structure and Trends

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About