2001
DOI: 10.1174/021093901609497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Cómo aprendí a dibujar? Las teorías de los niños sobre el aprendizaje

Abstract: Para investigar las ideas de los niños sobre el aprendizaje, entrevistamos a 26 niños de 4, 5 y 6 años individualmente. Se les presentaron tareas verbales y gráficas relativas a los siguientes componentes del aprendizaje del dibujo: condiciones, procesos y resultados. Se describen las categorías de respuesta más relevantes, que aluden a factores que intervienen en los diferentes componentes del aprendizaje del dibujo y se analizan las relaciones entre las respuestas dadas para las diferentes preguntas. Los res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpret the conceptual change from one theory to another as a process of hierarchical integration involving increasing complexity, dynamization and internalization of the agent (Scheuer, Pozo, De la Cruz, & Baccalá, 2001;Scheuer et al, 2002), similar to the trend proposed by Dienes and Perner (1999) in their theory of knowledge as a progressive process and hierarchical explicitation of the three knowledge components: content, attitude and self. Thus, and seeking a parallel to the results obtained in the study of learning to draw by Scheuer et al (2006a), the youngest music students would talk about what notes they have to learn (content) in order to play the instrument.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 68%
“…We interpret the conceptual change from one theory to another as a process of hierarchical integration involving increasing complexity, dynamization and internalization of the agent (Scheuer, Pozo, De la Cruz, & Baccalá, 2001;Scheuer et al, 2002), similar to the trend proposed by Dienes and Perner (1999) in their theory of knowledge as a progressive process and hierarchical explicitation of the three knowledge components: content, attitude and self. Thus, and seeking a parallel to the results obtained in the study of learning to draw by Scheuer et al (2006a), the youngest music students would talk about what notes they have to learn (content) in order to play the instrument.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 68%
“…That is, the inclusion of increasingly specific and complex products does not lead to the omission of precursor products as drawings, just as the inclusion of procedural and representational changes is not accompanied by the omission of reference to various products. Congruent with the development of children's implicit theories about learning to draw referred to in the Background section (Scheuer et al , 2002; Scheuer, Pozo, et al , 2001), two related dimensions of change intervene here: increasing complexity and internalization of agency . These dimensions are illustrated through the shift from the focus on isolated products or exemplars to the integration of procedural and representational writing changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We elaborated a system of descriptive categories to analyse the products children produced in order to illustrate their writing production for each of the requested ages and the procedural and representational changes they introduced among writings for successive ages. The coding system was based on the categories developed in the previous drawing study (see Scheuer, Pozo, et al , 2001) by opening those categories referring to the results of learning (we have not considered here the other components of learning, i.e. conditions and processes) and by including a few new categories specifically pertaining to writing (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview-studies conducted by Scheuer et al (2001Scheuer et al ( , 2006 have consistently showed that 3-to 4-year-old children hold the direct theory of learning and instruction, which is understood as the most naïve and intuitive. This theory is thought to be implicitly developed as a result of preschoolers' everyday experiences in cultural settings, and more specifically because of their engagement in formal and informal educational settings.…”
Section: 11-direct Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework was called implicit theories approach (for some publications in English, see Authors, 2010;Scheuer, Pozo, de la Cruz, & Baccalá, 2001;Scheuer, de la Cruz, Pozo, Huarte, & Sola, 2006). The influences of several well-established research lines can be easily identified in this approach, with postulates coming from theory of mind (e.g., Wellman, 1990), personal epistemologies (e.g., Hofer & Pintrich, 2002), conceptual change in specific domains (e.g., Vosniadou, 1994), and models about knowledge acquisition grounded in the implicit/explicit cognitive perspective (e.g., Karmiloff-Smith, 1992;Pozo, 2003;Rodrigo, Rodríguez, & Marrero, 1993;Strauss, 2005).…”
Section: 1-implicit Theories As a Framework To Investigate Learninmentioning
confidence: 99%