2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-41522017150351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação de cenários de tratamento de resíduos sólidos urbanos por meio da técnica da Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida: o caso do município de Garibaldi, RS

Abstract: that contemplated recycling associated with composting, recycling associated with anaerobic digestion followed by composting, and recycling associated with composting with incineration of waste and with energy recovery presented the best environmental performance, so they are indicated as possible treatment solutions for municipal solid waste in the case that was analyzed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
11
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The case study presented in this article corroborates the authors of the researched bibliography, in the sense of considering other MSW treatments before the nal disposal, as a sustainable strategy for municipal management, aiming at lower environmental impacts(Mersoni and Reichert 2017; Marchi 2015; Jacobi and Besen 2011; Wartchow et al 2011; Pandyaswargo and Premakumara 2014). "The present work reinforces the recommendations ofMersoni and Reichert (2017) andMarchi (2015), by suggesting that managers take into account environmental and social factors when making decisions about the MSW management model to be implemented in the municipalities, and highlighting that the problem of waste does not seem to be solved by just disposing of it inexpensive land lls.In this sense, it is emphasized that the technological simplicity of the proposed composting model for the case study in Paraíba do Sul (UFSC Method) contributes to success in the local context -which can be replicated in several small Brazilian cities. This idea was worked on both byMarchi (2015) when commenting on the abandonment of land lls due to lack of technical capacity and nancial resources, and by Jacobi and Besen (2011), who highlight the need for commitment by city halls and the technological adequacy of management solutions of MSW.Also in terms of the operating costs of the composting units, it is interesting to keep it simple, as in the proposed case study.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The case study presented in this article corroborates the authors of the researched bibliography, in the sense of considering other MSW treatments before the nal disposal, as a sustainable strategy for municipal management, aiming at lower environmental impacts(Mersoni and Reichert 2017; Marchi 2015; Jacobi and Besen 2011; Wartchow et al 2011; Pandyaswargo and Premakumara 2014). "The present work reinforces the recommendations ofMersoni and Reichert (2017) andMarchi (2015), by suggesting that managers take into account environmental and social factors when making decisions about the MSW management model to be implemented in the municipalities, and highlighting that the problem of waste does not seem to be solved by just disposing of it inexpensive land lls.In this sense, it is emphasized that the technological simplicity of the proposed composting model for the case study in Paraíba do Sul (UFSC Method) contributes to success in the local context -which can be replicated in several small Brazilian cities. This idea was worked on both byMarchi (2015) when commenting on the abandonment of land lls due to lack of technical capacity and nancial resources, and by Jacobi and Besen (2011), who highlight the need for commitment by city halls and the technological adequacy of management solutions of MSW.Also in terms of the operating costs of the composting units, it is interesting to keep it simple, as in the proposed case study.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…No entanto, antes de se proporem e implementarem mudanças no sistema de gestão de resíduos sólidos (RS), Chang e Pires (2015) sugerem a utilização de algum método de apoio à decisão. Na literatura, é possível levantar diversos estudos que utilizam métodos desse tipo no planejamento de sistemas de gestão de resíduos, de forma a avaliar e comparar diferentes alternativas (MERSONI; REICHERT, 2017;MENDES, 2014;SOLTANI et al, 2015;YAP;NIXON, 2015). A seleção de alternativas de tratamento de resíduos é um processo complexo, em que se devem considerar diferentes critérios de avaliação, como o social, o ambiental e o econômico (QAZI; ABUSHAMMALA; AZAM, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…There is a direct relationship between the ratio of hydrogen to carbon and the concentration of soot. The higher the H/C ratio, the higher the concentration of soot particles [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%