2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/455/1/012102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Additive Manufacturing over Conventional Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PIM is applied to produce complex features and intricate shapes. They are less expensive than other methods like 3D printing [4,5]. By using the PIM method, a variety of thermoplastics, including ABS, Nylon, PLA, Polycarbonate, PEEK, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Polystyrene, and Polyvinyl Chloride, are frequently utilized [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PIM is applied to produce complex features and intricate shapes. They are less expensive than other methods like 3D printing [4,5]. By using the PIM method, a variety of thermoplastics, including ABS, Nylon, PLA, Polycarbonate, PEEK, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Polystyrene, and Polyvinyl Chloride, are frequently utilized [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, automatic WAAM technology has replaced the traditional manual welding method gradually because of its higher accuracy and better economic efficiency, which will be a development trend in hot forging die remanufacturing field [3][4][5]. Different from conventional powder-based 3D printing, the WAAM process needs to satisfy some welding requirements such as reducing repetitive filling or underfilling, air travel, and arc breaking [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%