2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of adiabatic logic challenges for low power CMOS circuit designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different adiabatic techniques in the literature [5] In "Efficient Charge Recovery Logic (ECRL)" Logic, a pair of pull_down NMOS network and pull_up PMOS network forms the logic in ECRL. Both pre-charge and assessment(evaluation) are conducted concurrently in this technique.…”
Section: "Adiabatic Logic" Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different adiabatic techniques in the literature [5] In "Efficient Charge Recovery Logic (ECRL)" Logic, a pair of pull_down NMOS network and pull_up PMOS network forms the logic in ECRL. Both pre-charge and assessment(evaluation) are conducted concurrently in this technique.…”
Section: "Adiabatic Logic" Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shrinking feature size of process technology has enhanced the potential performance of electronic devices, and the capacity of shift registers has increased significantly. Therefore, asking for less overhead integrated circuitry layout area [9][10][11][12] and less power consumption [9,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] in the shift registers design then becomes more important with the capacity increasing [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%