2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.700405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of histological results of visible lesion thresholds for thermal and LIB induced skin damage at 1.3 μm and 1.5 μm

Abstract: An assessment of skin damage caused by near-IR laser exposures is reported. The damage from two distinct laser-tissue temporal regimes is compared at two wavelengths (1.3 µm and 1.5 µm). Skin damage caused by thermal effects from single laser pulses is compared to damage caused by LIB (laser induced breakdown) using histological examinations. Modeling applications are explored to determine crossover points between thermal and photomechanical damage thresholds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses for the 1.54 µm and 1.318 µm, nanosecond exposures have also been conducted. 9 The results of these histological examinations show the possibility of mechanical stress causing some of damage. In addition to mechanical stress related damage, there also appears to be a wavelength dependence on some of the types of damage seen.…”
Section: Histological Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses for the 1.54 µm and 1.318 µm, nanosecond exposures have also been conducted. 9 The results of these histological examinations show the possibility of mechanical stress causing some of damage. In addition to mechanical stress related damage, there also appears to be a wavelength dependence on some of the types of damage seen.…”
Section: Histological Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thresholds for the transition from healthy skin tissue function to optically induced damage are typically quantified in terms of a laser irradiation level for a given exposure duration and damage criterion. [1][2][3][4][5][6] These thresholds can vary greatly across different types of lasers, as skin and subcutaneous tissues feature different degrees of optical absorption and scattering dependent on the particular wavelength of light involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, laser damage studies have been content to report exposure dose thresholds for a specific set of parameters, such as beam diameter and exposure duration, [1][2][3][4][5][6] and make extrapolations for untested parameters based on observed trends. The possibility of pulsed laser exposure complicates this parameter space, adding terms such as duty cycle and number of pulses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%