2016 IEEE 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpeices.2016.7853632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of Hysteresis Current Control and SVPWM on Fuzzy Logic based vector controlled Induction Motor Drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is observed especially in case of stair case and step speed inputs. The time to settle down is approximately less than 0.03 s. The FLC performs better in terms of fast response, low starting current, low overshoot, and low undershoot comparatively [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is observed especially in case of stair case and step speed inputs. The time to settle down is approximately less than 0.03 s. The FLC performs better in terms of fast response, low starting current, low overshoot, and low undershoot comparatively [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The hysteresis current control (HCC) method has been commonly used in many power electronics applications, due to its simple implementation, fast dynamic response, and intrinsic robustness to parameter variations [22]. Moreover, the HCC technique is based on its applicability on nonlinear control techniques, low software requirements, high reliability, and fewer tracking errors [23]. The standard HCC operation is performed by comparing the actual phase current with the corresponding reference in a determined tolerance band, generating the switching states.…”
Section: Hpcc Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [63] introduced the hysteresis controller to improve the LVRT performance of the DFIG system. Nevertheless, the hysteresis current controller suffers some drawbacks like high chattering [64], significant harmonics [65], and extended operating time [66].…”
Section: Hysteresis Control Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software‐based LVRT techniques do not need any auxiliary device to ride through low voltage fault of the DFIG system. Therefore, software based LVRT techniques are used as an alternative to hardware‐based LVRT techniques in the literature [55–80] and are explained in the following paragraph of this paper.…”
Section: Lvrt Techniques For Dfig Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%