2018
DOI: 10.4103/ijfo.ijfo_7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of kvaal's and cameriere's methods for dental age estimation: A panoramic radiographic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The skulls were collected in and around Kolkata from the early 1970s to the late 1980s, and were imported legitimately from India for academic research and education. As the identity of the specimens were not known; sex and age were estimated using forensic anthropological methods: sex, according to Krogman and Iscan (1986) and Singh et al (2015), and age, according to Gazge et al (2018). The GAs of these mandibular specimens were measured using a mandibulometer (GPM Anthropological Instruments, Zurich, Switzerland) and categorized into two groups: the L-GA group, where GA ≤ 120° (n = 13 mandibles), and the H-GA group, where GA ≥ 125° (n = 16 mandibles).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skulls were collected in and around Kolkata from the early 1970s to the late 1980s, and were imported legitimately from India for academic research and education. As the identity of the specimens were not known; sex and age were estimated using forensic anthropological methods: sex, according to Krogman and Iscan (1986) and Singh et al (2015), and age, according to Gazge et al (2018). The GAs of these mandibular specimens were measured using a mandibulometer (GPM Anthropological Instruments, Zurich, Switzerland) and categorized into two groups: the L-GA group, where GA ≤ 120° (n = 13 mandibles), and the H-GA group, where GA ≥ 125° (n = 16 mandibles).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bodecker in 1925 was the first one to show the correlation between deposition of secondary dentin and chronological age. Then, in 1950, Gustafson considered it as one of the parameters (Gazge et al 2018).…”
Section: Secondary Dentin Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as dental age estimation is concerned, several methods have been proposed for assessing dental development, which is generally referred to as dental age 16 . Morphologic and radiographic methods (Cameriere’s, Schour-Massler’s, Demirjian’s, and Kvaal’s method) are useful in living humans 17 , whereas biochemistry methods (Gustafson’s and Johanson’s method, Bang and Ramm method, aspartic acid racemization and cemental annulation technique) are useful in dead victims 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%