Comparative Analysis of McDm Methods for the Assessment of Ict Development in G7 Countries

Ersoy, Nazlı

doi:10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.003

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This method has the advantage of minimizing the rank reversal phenomenon [7]. With this advantage, it is strongly exploited to rank the solutions in many different cases such as ranking the online learning websites [8], choosing the materials to manufacture some parts in F1 racing cars [9], choosing natural fibers for car roofs [10], evaluating the logistics performance index of EU countries [11], selecting the additives for a material production process [12], selecting the turning processes [13,14], selection of selection of grinding options [15], choosing renewable energy source [16], evaluating the financial performance of companies [17], evaluating the information and communication technology developments of G7 Countries [18], selecting the location for construction of the storehouse in logistics [19], selecting the location for construction of textile facilities in Sivas province in Turkey [20], selecting the suppliers [21], choosing a house design model to minimize the consumption of materials when building [22], selecting offshore location for construction of Offshore wind farm (OWF) in the energy industry [23], ect. Thus, it can be seen that PIV has been successfully used in many cases in many different fields.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combination of DOE and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making

Trung¹,

Tan²

2023

J Appl Eng Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When performing the multi-criteria decision making to choose the best solution, if some solutions are removed from the list of solutions or some solutions are added to the list of solutions, the decision making must be re-performed from the begining. This study proposes a new method to remove this limitation. The combination of the DOE (Design Of Experimental) method and PIV (Proximity Indexed Value) method is proposed in this paper. This combination is used to build the relationship between the scores of the solutions and the criteria. When the list of solution to be ranked has been removed or have been added some solutions, the ranking of some solutions only needs to use this relationship without having to recalculate from the beginning. Four different examples were applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The obtained results show that the proposed method ensures the required accuracy as well as its outstanding advantages. The limitations of the proposed method that need to be overcome are also pointed out at the end of this paper.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combination of DOE and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making

Trung¹,

Tan²

2023

J Appl Eng Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Zavadskas, et al in [4] the COPRAS method is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method that is used to evaluate alternatives where the ratio based on two measures, the sum of the performance of the favorable criteria and the sum of the unfavorable criteria. The COPRAS method is used for the assessment of ICT development in G7 countries [5], vulnerability mapping of subwatershed erosion [6], green logistics and green supply chain management [7], Decision Making for New Student Admissions at MTsN Bangkalan [8], motorcycle selection Electricity [9], multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind power plants [10], Supplier Selection at ABC Mining Companies in Indonesia [11], and Determination of Potential Zones for the Pasir Batu Mine [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

BPNT Program Beneficiaries Based on Copras and Codas

Midyanti

Bahri

Midyanti

2023

jitk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Determination of recipients of the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program (BPNT) is a matter that causes problems if it is not carried out in an objective, transparent, and targeted manner. Previous studies on BPNT were based on a specific method, which did not use a negative trend in the criteria. In this study, the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach was used to recommend the recipients of the BPNT program. Two MCDM models were used in this study, COPRAS and CODAS methods. Spearman's rank correlation method was used to determine the best model and measure the degree of similarity between the results obtained from different models. Spearman rank correlation shows that COPRAS and CODAS have a strong positive correlation of 0.89899. The combined COPRAS-CODAS ranking model produces a very strong positive correlation value of 0.9744 for both methods, so the model is used for recommendations for BPNT program recipients.

show abstract

Avrupa Ve Orta Asya Ülkeleri̇nde Bi̇t Geli̇şmi̇şli̇k Düzeyi̇ni̇n Entegre Mpsi-Raps Yöntemi̇ İle Ölçülmesi̇

Şahin Macit

2024

Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışma, 2023 BİT gelişim endeksi raporunda yer alan 10 göstergeye dayanarak Avrupa ve Orta Asya için seçilmiş 14 ülkenin Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri (BİT) gelişmişlik düzeylerini MPSI- RAPS entegre yöntemiyle objektif bir şekilde ele alarak gelecekteki politika ve stratejiler için temel bilgiler sunmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kriter olarak dikkate alınan göstergelerin ağırlık değerleri MPSI yöntemi ile tespit edilmiş; ülkelerin kriterlere göre gelişmişlik düzeylerinin belirlenip karşılaştırılması ise RAPS yöntemi yapılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda en önemli kriterin sabit geniş bant internet sepet fiyatı (% GSMH/k.) olduğu; en önemsiz kriterin ise en az 3G mobil ağının kapsadığı nüfus (%) olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Avusturya BİT gelişmişlik düzeyinde en üst sırayı alırken, Azerbaycan en düşük düzeyde olan ülke olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, MPSI-RAPS entegre yöntemi analiziyle elde edilen sıralamalar ile BİT (Bilgi Teknolojileri) gelişmişlik indeksi raporundaki sıralamalar arasında anlamlı ve güçlü bir pozitif ilişki olduğu, Spearman Rho Korelasyon testi sonucunda ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu bulgu, MPSI-RAPS entegre yönteminin ülkelerin BİT gelişmişlik düzeylerini değerlendirmede kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir.

show abstract

Comparative Analysis of McDm Methods for the Assessment of Ict Development in G7 Countries

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

Combination of DOE and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making

Combination of DOE and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making

BPNT Program Beneficiaries Based on Copras and Codas

Avrupa Ve Orta Asya Ülkeleri̇nde Bi̇t Geli̇şmi̇şli̇k Düzeyi̇ni̇n Entegre Mpsi-Raps Yöntemi̇ İle Ölçülmesi̇

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About