1994
DOI: 10.1002/dc.2840100116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of DNA analysis in effusions by lmage analysis and flow cytometry

Abstract: Cytologic evaluation of body cavity fluids is useful to detect malignancy within the pleural and peritoneal spaces. A definitive diagnosis cannot always be made on cytologic evaluation alone. As malignant processes may show abnormal DNA content, DNA analysis of effusions may be useful. Therefore, we determined the DNA content of 37 effusions by flow cytometry (FC) and image analysis (IA) using the CAS 200. Of the 37 fluids evaluated, 18 were cytologically malignant, 15 benign, and four atypical. Overall, 22 fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study 18 of the 28 (64%) malignant effusions were aneuploid. All (14) benign pleural effusions were diploid, consistent with reports of others [1,14,23]. Based on the above mentioned results this type of DNA analysis had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 100%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the current study 18 of the 28 (64%) malignant effusions were aneuploid. All (14) benign pleural effusions were diploid, consistent with reports of others [1,14,23]. Based on the above mentioned results this type of DNA analysis had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 100%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In conclusion, these results confirm data from literature and indicate that cytometric analysis of nuclear content is a useful marker for identification of malignant cells in equivocal effusions and can be used to increase the cytological sensitivity in doubtful mesothelial proliferations or combined with IHC for distinction between primary or secondary tumors of the serous membranes. 16,17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 5-7 These include immunological methods, ligand techniques, and flow and static DNA cytometry. [8][9][10] Without doubt, specific staining techniques such as immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry must be performed in the primary diagnostic laboratory, whereas images can easily be sent to any specialised department by electronic mail, and the image information can be extracted by specialists from these transmitted images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%