1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91678-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Efficacy of Chloramphenicol, Ampicillin, and Co-Trimoxazole in the Treatment Of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chloramphenicol is likely to remain the drug of choice for disease caused by chloramphenicol-susceptible strains, because chloramphenicol is cheaper, readily available for both oral and parenteral use, and regularly renders patients afebrile within 10 d after the start of treatment [21,22]. The role of ceftriaxone and other newer cephalosporins in typhoid fever will be in disease due to multiply resistant strains of S. typhi [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chloramphenicol is likely to remain the drug of choice for disease caused by chloramphenicol-susceptible strains, because chloramphenicol is cheaper, readily available for both oral and parenteral use, and regularly renders patients afebrile within 10 d after the start of treatment [21,22]. The role of ceftriaxone and other newer cephalosporins in typhoid fever will be in disease due to multiply resistant strains of S. typhi [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The succinate ester prodrug is used for intravenous or intramuscular administration and gives lower serum levels than the oral form (436,437). Chloramphenicol has been shown to be clinically effective in a number of studies (341,(438)(439)(440)(441)(442)(443)(444)(445)(446)(447). Disadvantages of chloramphenicol are its four-times-daily administration and the need to give it for at least 2 weeks to reduce the 10 to 15% risk of relapse.…”
Section: Traditional First-line Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose-related and reversible bone marrow depression and irreversible bone marrow aplasia that is rare, unpredictable, and often fatal may occur (448). Amoxicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were shown to have efficacy generally comparable to that of chloramphenicol with less risk of toxicity, although they also needed to be given for at least 2 weeks to avoid relapse (439,(449)(450)(451)(452)(453)(454)(455)(456). The experience with mecillinam was less convincing (456)(457)(458).…”
Section: Traditional First-line Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amoxicillin and cefazolin have been used successfully in patients with R strains (15,19,32) and S strains [30, 34a, 40]. Nevertheless, chloramphenicol was shown to be superior to ampicillin and TMP-SMZ for ty-phoid fever caused by S strains (36). Our results suggesting unsatisfactory responses in patients with S strains both to ampicillin and to TMP-SMZ make it imperative that susceptibility testing be done in areas where antimicrobial resistance has been reported in order that chloramphenicol can be given to patients with S strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives to chloramphenicol, which have been shown to be clinically effective, include ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (1,4,16,21,22,23,31,33,35,36,39). TMP-SMZ offered promise because of favorable results in the treatment of antimicrobial-susceptible typhoid fever (4,16,21,22,33,39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%