2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1472-9288(03)00022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative physiological and serotoninergic properties of pulvinar neurons in the monkey, cat and ferret

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to remark that HAGPA is a cellular mechanism, and that the functional implications of integrating it in the active network have not yet been explored. To our knowledge, I h has not been specifically characterized in monkey prefrontal cortex, although it has been identified in monkey pulvinar (37), and h-channels are present in the human brain (38), consistent with I h and HAGPA also being present in primate prefrontal cortex. Although we cannot provide statistical information at this stage, we have occasionally recorded HAGPA in somatosensory and visual cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, it is important to remark that HAGPA is a cellular mechanism, and that the functional implications of integrating it in the active network have not yet been explored. To our knowledge, I h has not been specifically characterized in monkey prefrontal cortex, although it has been identified in monkey pulvinar (37), and h-channels are present in the human brain (38), consistent with I h and HAGPA also being present in primate prefrontal cortex. Although we cannot provide statistical information at this stage, we have occasionally recorded HAGPA in somatosensory and visual cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Especially problematic, for example, is the varying affinities and distances from transmitter release of multiple subtypes of receptors for the same neurotransmitter, the ability of some neurotransmitter systems to activate opposing postsynaptic responses (e.g. opening one K + current while closing another), the ability of synapses to release more than one transmitter [33], species specific differences in the response of neurons to a given transmitter [34,35], and the dependence of the response of a neuron to a neurotransmitter on the state of activation of other neurotransmitter receptors on that neuron [36]. The recent use of optogenetics to release neurotransmitters from selective terminals will enhance our understanding of the cellular mechanisms of state control.…”
Section: Neurotransmitter Systems Involved In State Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the level of extracellular serotonin is consistent with the pattern of discharge in dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) serotonergic neurons which show the highest firing rate during wakefulness, followed by a decrease during SWS and by virtual electrical silence during PS sleep (Jacobs and Fornal 1999;Portas et al 2000;Saper et al 2001). Serotonergic regulation of the sleep/wake cycle involves a number of 5-HT receptor subtypes, and the role of 5-HT 1A , 5-HT 1B , 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2C , 5-HT 3 and 5-HT 7 receptors has been demonstrated by several studies (Borbely et al 1988;Monti and Jantos 1992;Monti et al 1995Monti et al , 1999Kantor et al 2000Kantor et al , 2002Andrade 2001a, 2001b;Filakovszky et al 2001;Monckton and McCormick 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%