1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01238.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies on the feeding selectivity of silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and bighead carp Aristichthys nobilis

Abstract: Silver carp and bighead carp exhibited size‐selection for food particles in aquarium experiments, but did not select their preferred species of plankton actively when they were distributed evenly in the water. They also possessed the capacity of selection for feeding area. The removal rates (% g−1 fish weight) of silver carp for smaller plankton (phytoplankton) were higher than those of bighead carp. The removal rates by the latter for bigger plankton (zooplankton) were higher than those of silver carp, but fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the effects of bighead carp were consistently greater than the native planktivore, in terms of changes to zooplankton densities, larval bluegill growth rates, and by likely delaying ontogenetic habitat shifts. Both native and invasive planktivores reduced zooplankton densities in a manner consistent with reports by others (Collins, Detmer, Nelson, Sass, & Wahl, 2018;Cooke, Hill, & Meyer, 2009;Dong & Li, 1994;Sass et al, 2014;Xie & Chen, 2001). However, the reduced growth rates experienced by larval bluegill did not consistently lead to reduced survival within mesocosms or reduced relative abundance within ponds, suggesting a decoupling of the response of individuals from that of the population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the effects of bighead carp were consistently greater than the native planktivore, in terms of changes to zooplankton densities, larval bluegill growth rates, and by likely delaying ontogenetic habitat shifts. Both native and invasive planktivores reduced zooplankton densities in a manner consistent with reports by others (Collins, Detmer, Nelson, Sass, & Wahl, 2018;Cooke, Hill, & Meyer, 2009;Dong & Li, 1994;Sass et al, 2014;Xie & Chen, 2001). However, the reduced growth rates experienced by larval bluegill did not consistently lead to reduced survival within mesocosms or reduced relative abundance within ponds, suggesting a decoupling of the response of individuals from that of the population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The tendency suggested that the feeding intensity of paddlefish decreased compared to bighead carp when food resources (cladocera and copepoda) became scarce in this study. A possible explanation is that bighead carp could switch to trap smaller food items during periods when large zooplankton densities were low (Cremer and Smitherman, ; Jennings, ; Opuszynski et al., ; Takamura et al., ; Dong and Li, ; Lieberman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The silver and bighead carps were intentionally introduced into the southern USA and the Canadian province of Alberta to control eutrophication in lakes and ponds Cudmore 1999a, 1999b;Mandrak and Cudmore 2004). These species feed on phytoplankton and small zooplankton and may compete with juveniles of many native fishes (Dong and Li 1994;Fuller et al 1999). Black carp are molluscivorous and pose a threat to endangered molluscs (Ferber 2001); they may also compete with native molluscivorous fishes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%