Comparative study of DIPSI and WHO 2018 criteria for diagnosis of GDM

Shrestha, Biloni; Pokhrel, Laxman

doi:10.3126/nmcj.v22i1-2.30023

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study by Shrestha B et al . [ 10 ] showed that the sensitivity of DIPSI was 73.68% and the specificity was 98.52%. The agreement between both the studies was 60–80%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diabetes in pregnancy study group of India, the answer for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis dilemma: May be not!!!!

Gupta

Daga²

2022

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: For many years, there has been a lack of consensus over the appropriate diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the significance of the diagnosis. Multiple guidelines on diagnostic criteria across the world have complicated the diagnosis and further management of the disease, also complicating the healthcare delivery system. Aim: To compare the prevalence of GDM according to Modified Carpenter & Coustan, International association of Diabetes & Pregnancy Group (IADPSG) and DIPSI. Settings and Design: It was cross sectional observational study, conducted at KGMU, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh between Aug 2016 and Sept 2017. 162 patients were enrolled after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methods and Material: The study population was derived by screening pregnant females attending for their routine antenatal check up from 24 to 28 weeks of gestation. Plasma glucose levels was measured following 8hrs of overnight fasting. The pregnant females were given 82.5 glucose (equivalent to 75gm anhydrous glucose). Venous blood sample was collected for estimating plasma glucose at 0,1and 2hr. Results: In our study the prevalence of GDM among study population according to IADPSG criteria was 22.64%, as per Modified Carpenter & Coustan criteria was 17.61% while that as per DIPSI criteria was 13.21%. Conclusions: Considering IADPSG criteria as gold standard DIPSI is missing 66.6% of patients diagnosed as GDM by IADPSG. Considering Modified C&C criteria as gold standard over the years DIPSI is missing 64.2% of patients diagnosed as GDM by C&C.

show abstract

“…A study by Shrestha B et al . [ 10 ] showed that the sensitivity of DIPSI was 73.68% and the specificity was 98.52%. The agreement between both the studies was 60–80%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diabetes in pregnancy study group of India, the answer for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis dilemma: May be not!!!!

Gupta

Daga²

2022

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…DIPI is a reliable, feasible and suitable method to diagnose GDM. The DIPSI criteria is just as sensitive as the WHO 2018 criteria in a hospital setting [22]. In a study conducted among 425 pregnant women, GDM was diagnosed in 5.88%, were to 80% among DIPSI and WHO 2018 criteria.…”

Section: Advantage Of Dipsi Criteria Over Other Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

DIPSI criteria-cost-effective approach in low resource setup in developing countries

Balaji¹,

Balaji²,

Seshiah³

et al. 2021

IJSRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present scenario the prevalence of Gestation diabetes is rapidly increasing worldwide. Women with diabetes during pregnancy are not different from other women in their concern for their foetuses, perhaps they need to put more effort, as the slight variation from the normal value might have a major impact on fetal well-being. In India alone, GDM affects five million women each year, which is a huge burden for the health care providers to deal with. Henceforth, screening and diagnostic criteria for testing GDM should be convenient, practically possible and cost effective. DIPSI test is introduced in India should be made as a central point of discussion and consideration. The current review focused on the screening and diagnostic criteria of GDM in low resource setting using DIPSI criteria.

show abstract

Efectele placentare ale rezistenţei la insulină în sarcinile complicate cu diabet zaharat gestaţional

Gabriela,

Nicolae-Gabriel,

Francesca

et al. 2024

Obstetrica şi Ginecologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative study of DIPSI and WHO 2018 criteria for diagnosis of GDM

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

Diabetes in pregnancy study group of India, the answer for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis dilemma: May be not!!!!

Diabetes in pregnancy study group of India, the answer for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis dilemma: May be not!!!!

DIPSI criteria-cost-effective approach in low resource setup in developing countries

Efectele placentare ale rezistenţei la insulină în sarcinile complicate cu diabet zaharat gestaţional

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About