2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Drools and Ontology Reasoning Approaches for Automated Monitoring in Telecommunication Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite Drools is a good option to develop rule-based decision support systems, it does not allow the direct use of ontologies. Furthermore, Drools adopt an object-oriented approach, which is less expressive than OWL, which has a better representation and inference [31]. Also, in Drools, rules are written in DRL (Drools Rule Language) language, an open-source but non-standard language.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite Drools is a good option to develop rule-based decision support systems, it does not allow the direct use of ontologies. Furthermore, Drools adopt an object-oriented approach, which is less expressive than OWL, which has a better representation and inference [31]. Also, in Drools, rules are written in DRL (Drools Rule Language) language, an open-source but non-standard language.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in Drools, rules are written in DRL (Drools Rule Language) language, an open-source but non-standard language. In this sense, SWRL rules are simpler and easier to define than DRL rules [31]. On the other hand, works such as [12,24,28] relied on fussy technologies for developing the rules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, issues related to interdomain interactions must still be addressed. Ordóñez et al present an interesting idea, ie, introducing ontology and semantic‐based approaches to typical daily CSP activities, such as network monitoring and error detection. They compare the OWL approach to the DROOLS approach and conclude that despite the better performance of DROOLS on large data sets, OWL, a semantic approach, is more convenient because it can adopt new and already existing ontologies and offers better possibilities for expressing rules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rule-based system is a form of an expert system which usually uses an ontology-based representation to codify the information into a knowledge-base that contains facts which can be used later in the reasoning stage [26]. A rule-based system depends on two kinds of memory as it is shown in Figure 4a.…”
Section: Rule-based Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%