2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2876883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Kalman Filters and Observers for Power System Dynamic State Estimation With Model Uncertainty and Malicious Cyber Attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constants to generate sigma points are set to be α = 0.1, β = 2, and κ = −1. The initial state error covariance matrix is the same as in (16).…”
Section: Comparing L ∞ Observer With Other Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The constants to generate sigma points are set to be α = 0.1, β = 2, and κ = −1. The initial state error covariance matrix is the same as in (16).…”
Section: Comparing L ∞ Observer With Other Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same test system has been used in [16]. The input vector u(t), which consists of i R and i I , and unknown input q m (t), which consists of T m and E fd , are obtained from simulations of the whole system in which each generator is using a transient model with IEEE Type DC1 excitation system and a simplified turbinegovernor system [16], [51]. To generate dynamic response, we apply a three-phase fault at Bus 32 of Branch 32-30 and clear the fault at the near and remote ends after 0.05 and 0.1 seconds.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate and reliable dynamic state information of synchronous machines plays a crucial role in real-time monitoring, protection, and control of power systems [1,2]. In addition, the emerging application of situational awarenessputs forward higher requirements for the status information acquisition as the system states evolve more complexly and quickly due to increasing cyber attacks [3] and high penetrations of renewable generations [4,5]. However, some important synchronous machine state variables cannot be directly obtained.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation data are listed as follows: 1) The sampling rate is assumed 50 samples/s; 2) The simulation time step is set to 0.02 s; 3) The standard deviations of the rotor angle and the rotor speed are respectively 2° and 0.1%; 4) The standard deviations of the phase angle and amplitude of terminal voltages are 0.1° and 0.1%;5) A PMU is equipped at the terminal of each generator [1,27].…”
Section: All Simulations Have Been Performed Under the Matlab Environmentioning
confidence: 99%