1982
DOI: 10.1139/x82-119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing methods of predicting Jack pine slash moisture

Abstract: Moisture contents of fine fuels, litter, and duff from jack pine slash were recorded for three summers and compared with meteorological elements, the United States National Fire-Danger Rating System (NFDRS) roundwood moisture models, and the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) litter and duff moisture models. Predictions from the FWI models and some meteorological elements were superior to the NFDRS models for every fuel tested. It appears that the FWI models are well suited to moist climates, whereas the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CFFDRS is founded from the analysis of field data of three kinds: weather, fuel moisture and test fire behaviour, all collected over several decades (Simard and Main, 1982). The FWI System ( Pickett, 1985) was the first subsystem developed in the CFFDRS and it provides numerical ratings of relative fire potential based solely on weather observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFFDRS is founded from the analysis of field data of three kinds: weather, fuel moisture and test fire behaviour, all collected over several decades (Simard and Main, 1982). The FWI System ( Pickett, 1985) was the first subsystem developed in the CFFDRS and it provides numerical ratings of relative fire potential based solely on weather observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the aim of this study is to examine the fire danger indices only, a detailed assessment of the moisture and fuel availability models is not presented. Experimental examinations of the FFDI (Viney and Hatton 1989), FFBT (Viney andHatton 1989, Gould et al 2007) and FWI (Simard and Main 1982, Simard et al 1984, Wotton et al 2005) moisture models have been presented elsewhere.…”
Section: The Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests of the NFDRS model have shown that it severely underpredicted the early afternoon moisture contents of fine dead material and litter associated with a palmetto-gallberry fuel complex in the southern United States (Hough and Albini 1978) and a jack pine slash in the northern United States (Loomis andMain 1980, Simard andMain 1982). Harrington (1982) Loomis and Main (1980) and Simard and Main (1982), the use of regression and correlation statistics yields little information on the bias of the fuel moisture predictions.…”
Section: Previous Model Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harrington (1982) Loomis and Main (1980) and Simard and Main (1982), the use of regression and correlation statistics yields little information on the bias of the fuel moisture predictions. Simard and Main (1982) and Simard eta/.…”
Section: Previous Model Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation