2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09761-9_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing NERP-CRF with Publicly Available Portuguese Named Entities Recognition Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our LG recognizes only the 'individual' and 'position' subtypes of the 'person' category, its evaluation was also carried out using SAHARA for all types of categories by selecting the PERSON(*) setting. A comparison of the obtained results with the results of the four tools presented in [2] for the 'person' category is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our LG recognizes only the 'individual' and 'position' subtypes of the 'person' category, its evaluation was also carried out using SAHARA for all types of categories by selecting the PERSON(*) setting. A comparison of the obtained results with the results of the four tools presented in [2] for the 'person' category is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Second HAREM [9], the Rembrandt system, which uses grammar rules and Wikipedia as sources of knowledge [4], ranked best for the 'person' category. A comparison between four tools to recognize NEs in Portuguese texts [2] suggested that the rule-based approach is the most effective for person names. Recently, LGs have been successfully integrated in a hybrid approach to Portuguese NER [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testes mais recentes, utilizando os mesmos corpora que o HAREM, ofereceram resultados mais baixos, de 62% precisão e 66% abrangência para a mesma categoria de Lugar (Amaral et al, 2014), o qualé indicativo de que não houve um avanço significativo na resolução do problema.…”
Section: Trabalho Relacionadounclassified
“…A análise comparativa aqui apresentada de ferramentas para o RWR em textos distingue-se de trabalhos afins [48,49,51,52] pelas seguintes contribuições: (i) cobertura de uma variedade de subproblemas, métodos e ferramentas de áreas de pesquisa tradicionalmente separadas; (i) foco na análise de postagens em mídias sociais usando a língua portuguesa e (iii) resultados experimentais mais abrangentes, analisando a alta disparidade dos resultados gerados por ferramentas distintas. O estudo do estado da arte mostra que propostas recentes tendem ao uso de técnicas baseadas em aprendizado de máquina, pois estas começam a gerar melhores resultados.…”
Section: Conclusãounclassified