2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jd016856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing results from a physical model with satellite and in situ observations to determine whether biomass burning aerosols over the Amazon brighten or burn off clouds

Abstract: [1] Biomass burning (BB) aerosol particles affect clouds through competing microphysical and radiative (semi-direct and cloud absorption) effects, each of which dominates at different degrees of aerosol loading. Here, we analyze the influence of competing aerosol effects on mixed-phase clouds, precipitation, and radiative fields over the Amazon with a climate-air pollution-weather forecast model that treats aerosol-cloud-radiative interactions physically. Extensive comparisons with remotely sensed observations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
9
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of boundary layer turbulence and clouds may depend on the vertical orientation of the absorbing aerosols relative to the cloud layer, as well as on the response of the clouds themselves. For example, in the Amazon region, where deeper cumulus clouds are embedded in absorbing BC aerosols, the introduction of BC aerosols in a model experiment reduced TKE below the aerosol layer and increased TKE in a narrow layer above the aerosol layer (31). At low aerosol amounts, increasing aerosol led to taller clouds, whereas at high aerosol amounts, increasing aerosol led to reduced cloudiness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of boundary layer turbulence and clouds may depend on the vertical orientation of the absorbing aerosols relative to the cloud layer, as well as on the response of the clouds themselves. For example, in the Amazon region, where deeper cumulus clouds are embedded in absorbing BC aerosols, the introduction of BC aerosols in a model experiment reduced TKE below the aerosol layer and increased TKE in a narrow layer above the aerosol layer (31). At low aerosol amounts, increasing aerosol led to taller clouds, whereas at high aerosol amounts, increasing aerosol led to reduced cloudiness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accounting for aerosol absorption effects on clouds raises particularly challenging issues. These include effects on cloud heating by absorbing inclusions in droplets and of absorbing aerosol particles interstitially between droplets (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). (Note that the positive aerosol direct forcing contribution in Fig.…”
Section: Process-scale Modeling Of Aerosol−cloud Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we only acknowledge aerosol layers with an AOT > 0.2. These aerosols come mainly from desert dust (Weinzierl et al, 2011;Groß et al, 2015) but also from biomass burning (Rosário et al, 2011;Ten Hoeve et al, 2012) or, sometimes, sea salt (Toth et al, 2013). We assume that AOT ≤ 0.2 is a good approximation for the AOT of typical aerosol loads.…”
Section: Vertical Cloud-aerosol Structures From Caliopmentioning
confidence: 99%