2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-03838-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between collective protective systems in Brazil: safety platforms and safety net type V

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional approach and conventional practices of the construction industry provide leniency towards safety practices on site where negligence takes the life of many. Recent research has focused on curbing the occurrence of FFH accidents by proposing prevention through design (PtD) [7] and collective protection equipment (CPE) [8]. Similarly, several safety practices have been adopted on construction projects, such as using railings, safety nets, scaffoldings, hole coverings, personal protection equipment (PPE), safety harnesses, helmets, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach and conventional practices of the construction industry provide leniency towards safety practices on site where negligence takes the life of many. Recent research has focused on curbing the occurrence of FFH accidents by proposing prevention through design (PtD) [7] and collective protection equipment (CPE) [8]. Similarly, several safety practices have been adopted on construction projects, such as using railings, safety nets, scaffoldings, hole coverings, personal protection equipment (PPE), safety harnesses, helmets, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çelik [21] studied the application of protective nets in engineering and provided evaluations and suggestions for the shortcomings in the application. Filho [22] compared two fall protection measures used in construction in Brazil and found that protective measures with safety nets are safer. Segovia [23] established a numerical model to simulate the impact test of a "V"-type safety net with an impact energy of 7 kJ, emphasizing the importance of energy absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%