2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5030227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison electrical stimulation and passive stretching for blood glucose control type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Via alteration in the pulse amplitude, participants assigned to the NMES group received stimulation up to maximum tolerable levels (ensuring protocol adherence) to induce visible muscle contraction, and those assigned to control received stimulation on the lowest possible setting (sensory level: described previously as a tingling sensation). It has previously been demonstrated that NMES between 2 and 8 weeks with two to three sessions per week decrease fasting blood glucose when conducted on quadriceps muscle for 20–30 min per session ( 16 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 27 , 32 , 33 , 34 ). Therefore, in the current study, we employed 30 min of NMES per session three times per week over a 4-week period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via alteration in the pulse amplitude, participants assigned to the NMES group received stimulation up to maximum tolerable levels (ensuring protocol adherence) to induce visible muscle contraction, and those assigned to control received stimulation on the lowest possible setting (sensory level: described previously as a tingling sensation). It has previously been demonstrated that NMES between 2 and 8 weeks with two to three sessions per week decrease fasting blood glucose when conducted on quadriceps muscle for 20–30 min per session ( 16 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 27 , 32 , 33 , 34 ). Therefore, in the current study, we employed 30 min of NMES per session three times per week over a 4-week period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen studies reported on acute effects and 22 studies reported on chronic effects of NMES, with one of those studies reporting on both acute and chronic effects of NMES. Studies reported one or multiple measures of glycemic control/insulin sensitivity which included the fasting blood glucose (n=17) ( 30 , 50 52 , 56 68 ), fasting insulin (n=11) ( 23 , 31 , 50 52 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 69 71 ), homeostatic model assessment index (HOMA-IR) (n=4) ( 50 , 52 , 60 , 70 ), Matsuda index (n=1) ( 72 ), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (n=11) ( 23 , 29 , 31 , 45 , 69 75 ), meal glucose tolerance test (MGTT) (n=1) ( 73 ), HbA1c (n=5) ( 50 , 58 , 64 , 69 , 76 ), and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (n=6) ( 69 , 71 , 75 78 ). Among all longitudinal studies that met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis (N=9) reported fasting blood glucose before and after NMES intervention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for four studies that investigated young adult population ( 30 , 59 , 69 , 74 ), all studies were conducted in middle-aged and elderly men and women. Majority of the studies (n=16) reported improvement in glycemic control measured by various methods including fasting blood glucose ( 56 58 , 60 , 62 , 63 ), OGTT ( 23 , 29 , 31 , 72 , 79 ), MGTT ( 73 ), HbA1c ( 64 , 70 ), and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp ( 75 , 76 ), while two studies reported no changes in glycemic control as measured by fasted blood glucose ( 65 ), and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp ( 71 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations