2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 2D and 3D dynamic image analysis for characterization of natural sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The histograms of shape parameter for this coastal calcareous sediment are non-normal. This was also seen in [ 22 , 23 ] for the 2D DIA of Ledge Point and the Browse #1 hemipelagic calcareous sand. For this study, the Bounded Johnson Distributions [ 34 ] were fitted to all of the shape parameter histograms; fit lines are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The histograms of shape parameter for this coastal calcareous sediment are non-normal. This was also seen in [ 22 , 23 ] for the 2D DIA of Ledge Point and the Browse #1 hemipelagic calcareous sand. For this study, the Bounded Johnson Distributions [ 34 ] were fitted to all of the shape parameter histograms; fit lines are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Three types of particle shape descriptors were employed to quantify particle shape morphology ( Table 2 ). The selected shape descriptors are thought to capture independent shape features [ 23 ]. The numerical value of shape descriptors ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, where a symmetrical particle, such as a sphere, approaches 1.0, while a highly irregular particle has descriptors approaching, but never reaching, 0.…”
Section: Shape Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, for reasons of completeness, the photographic technique is mentioned here. For a full description, the reader is advised to review the description given by Li and Iskander [42] and Grace and Ebneyamini [43]. A summary of the techniques is given in Table 11.…”
Section: Particle Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 and Table 2 show the PSD and sphericity values of the as-atomized powder, as obtained from DIA. The definition of powder characteristics and comparison between different measurement techniques are discussed elsewhere [26][27][28]. Optomec's guideline for LENS ® DED is that the powder particles should be spherical (for good flowability) and with a size of −100/+325 mesh, equivalent to a powder diameter of 44 to 150 μm.…”
Section: Characterization Of the As-atomized Za-8 Powdermentioning
confidence: 99%