Comparison of Apical Leakage between Canals Filled with Gutta-Percha/AH-Plus and the Resilon/Epiphany System, When Submitted to Two Filling Techniques

Veríssimo, Denusa Moreira; Vale, Mônica Sampaio do; Monteiro, André Jalles

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.014

Cited by 29 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A resinbased root canal filling, Resilon, was launched in 2004 8) . It is capable of bonding to methacrylate-based sealers and as such may result in the prevention of microleakage and strengthening of the root treated tooth 9,10) . Root filling materials can be removed by a variety of techniques such as the use of stainless steel or nickeltitanium hand files, nickel-titanium rotary files or ultrasonic instruments with or without the adjunctive use of solvents or heat 11,12) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Micro-CT evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of rotary and hand instrumentation in removal of Resilon

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Micro-CT evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of rotary and hand instrumentation in removal of Resilon

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This is possibly because it makes use of plasticized material, which would promote greater fluidity and adaptation, in which the obturation "mass" would frame according to the format of the root canal [22].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of bacterial leakage between Epiphany and AH Plus sealers using single cone and Tagger’s hybrid obturation techniques

Rodrigues

Affonso

Vieira

et al. 2015

Rev. Odonto Ciênc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate and compare, by means of bacterial infiltration, the quality of sealing obtained by Tagger's hybrid (TH) and Single Cone (SC) techniques, in association with AH Plus/Gutta-percha (AH) and Epiphany/Resilon (ER). Methods: Palatal roots of 70 maxillary molars were instrumented and divided randomly into six groups: G1, TH/AH; G2, SC/AH; G3, TH/ER; G4, SC/ER; G5, negative control; G6, positive control. The roots were sterilized and monitored for 56 days to detect bacterial leakage using Enterococcus faecalis. The data were subjected to Binomial test (α<0.05) to compare the infiltration among groups and Kruskal-Wallis test (α<0.05) to analyze the infiltration as a function of time.Results: All positive controls leaked within 24 h; none of negative controls leaked. There was no influence of time on leakage. Individual comparisons showed that there were no influences of the techniques and filling materials on quality of root canal sealing. Significant difference was found only between G1 and G4 (p=0.0229), the G1 showed a lesser and G2 the higher quantity of infiltration. Conclusion: It could be concluded that none of the groups was able to prevent bacterial leakage and the lowest ability to prevent infiltration was obtained when applied SC/ER to filling the canal.Key words: Bacteria; Dental materials; Endodontic; Root canal obturation; Dental leakage.Comparação da infiltração bacteriana entre os cimentos Epiphany e AH Plus usando as técnicas de obturação de cone único e Híbrida de Tagger Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar e comparar, por meio da infiltração bacteriana, a qualidade de selamento obtido pelas técnicas híbrida de Tagger (TH) e do cone único (SC) associadas com AH Plus/Guta-percha (AH) e Epiphany/Resilon (ER) . Métodos: Raízes palatinas de 70 molares superiores foram instrumentadas e divididas aleatoriamente em seis grupos: G1, TH/AH; G2, SC/AH; G3, TH/ER; G4, SC/ER; G5, controle negativo; G6, controle positivo. As raízes foram esterilizadas e monitoradas durante 56 dias para detectar a infiltração bacteriana utilizando Enterococcus faecalis. Os dados foram submetidos a teste Binomial (α<0,05) ao comparar a infiltração entre grupos e Kruskal-Wallis (α<0,05) para analisar a infiltração, como uma função do tempo. Resultados: Todos os controles positivos infiltraram em 24 horas. Nenhum dos controles negativos infiltrou. Não houve influência do tempo na infiltração. Comparações individuais mostraram não haver influencia das técnicas e materiais de obturação na qualidade de selamento do canal radicular. Houve diferença significativa apenas entre G1 e G4 (P=0,0229), o G1 mostrou o menor e G4 a maior quantidade de infiltração. Conclusão: Nenhum dos grupos foi capaz de evitar a infiltração bacteriana e a menor capacidade de prevenir a infiltração foi obtida quando utilizados de SC/ER para obturar o canal.Palavras-chave: Bactérias, materiais dentários, endodontia, obturação do canal radicular, infiltração dentária. 88Rev Odonto Cienc 2014;29(3):87-91Assessment of bacterial leakage when using dif...

show abstract

“…4 In addition, research completed over the last few years, evaluating apical leakage of new methacrylate resin-based endodontic sealers, has shown good results. 2,18 In the evaluation of different endodontic techniques, dye is commonly used for in vitro studies as an indicator of apical leakage, which is illustrated by the dye penetration between the canal walls and the obturating materials. 18,22,23 In this study, 50% silver nitrate impregnation was used to measure apical leakage.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[13][14][15][16][17] Currently, studies with Epiphany (Pentron Clinical, Orange, USA) and RealSeal (Sybron Endo, Redmond, USA), both methacrylate-based resin sealers, have shown promising results in comparison with other base sealers. 1,18,19 However, it is not well-known if the combined association of intracanal Declaration of Interests: The authors certify that they have no commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the manuscript.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of prior 810-nm-diode intracanal laser irradiation on hydrophilic resin-based sealer obturation

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Apical Leakage between Canals Filled with Gutta-Percha/AH-Plus and the Resilon/Epiphany System, When Submitted to Two Filling Techniques

Cited by 29 publications

References 30 publications

Micro-CT evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of rotary and hand instrumentation in removal of Resilon

Micro-CT evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of rotary and hand instrumentation in removal of Resilon

Comparison of bacterial leakage between Epiphany and AH Plus sealers using single cone and Tagger’s hybrid obturation techniques

Influence of prior 810-nm-diode intracanal laser irradiation on hydrophilic resin-based sealer obturation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About