2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03650.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial isolates associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs

Abstract: Aims:  Comparison of biochemical vs molecular methods for identification of microbial populations associated with failed loggerhead turtle eggs. Methods and Results:  Two biochemical (API and Microgen) and one molecular methods (16s rRNA analysis) were compared in the areas of cost, identification, corroboration of data with other methods, ease of use, resources and software. The molecular method was costly and identified only 66% of the isolates tested compared with 74% for API. A 74% discrepancy in identific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no diVerence in embryonic stages at which embryos died in the diVerent density plots. Although microbes have been identiWed from dead sea turtle eggs (Wyneken et al 1988;Acuna et al 1999;Awong-Taylor et al 2007), there was probably limited microbial activity in our experimental plots because there were no broken eggs and we cleaned organic matter from the experimental plots before placing clutches there. Therefore, it is unlikely that there was a direct microbial impact on hatchability in our experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There was no diVerence in embryonic stages at which embryos died in the diVerent density plots. Although microbes have been identiWed from dead sea turtle eggs (Wyneken et al 1988;Acuna et al 1999;Awong-Taylor et al 2007), there was probably limited microbial activity in our experimental plots because there were no broken eggs and we cleaned organic matter from the experimental plots before placing clutches there. Therefore, it is unlikely that there was a direct microbial impact on hatchability in our experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The loggerhead turtle is included in the Red List of the world conservation union, and the microbial contamination of the turtle eggs is suspected to play a role in embryonic death and a low loggerhead hatch success rate in Georgia, USA. Indeed, among other Gram-negative isolates from unhatched eggs of the turtle on Jekyll Island, Georgia, P. penneri and P. vulgaris strains were identified [10]. …”
Section: Proteus Spp In Animals—adverse and Friendlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of the etiology of low egg viability may ultimately lead to a treatment modality to increase the hatching rate of this critically endangered species. Indeed, recent reports demonstrated that bacteria (Awong‐Jaylor et al ., 2008) and the fungus, Fusarium solani (Sarmiento‐Ramirez et al ., 2010), were responsible for/associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs, making it clear that egg‐associated pathogens are an area of concern for leatherback turtles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%