2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2011.6063885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of calorimetric and electrical loss measurement methods in a frequency converter research and development application

Abstract: New applications of frequency converters such as solar energy have growing need to determine the efficiency of a converter with good precision. The component level losses are not easy to measure as the input and output of converter components are not sinusoidal. The calorimetric method gives an approach for measuring the losses directly rather than using the difference of the electrically measured quantities. This paper compares the feasibility of the described methods in an active rectifier input filter power… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24] a comparison between the calorimetric and the electrical method is made when measuring an active rectifier input LCL filter. In this ultimate case, the first power analyzer can catch only 44% from the actual expected loss and the state-of-the-art power analyzer can measure 91% of the losses with optimal settings.…”
Section: Bibliographical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24] a comparison between the calorimetric and the electrical method is made when measuring an active rectifier input LCL filter. In this ultimate case, the first power analyzer can catch only 44% from the actual expected loss and the state-of-the-art power analyzer can measure 91% of the losses with optimal settings.…”
Section: Bibliographical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the experience in using them is only now gathering into best practice and it will take time to fully understand their capabilities and assess their true accuracy. In reality, assessing their accuracy will have to be done through comparisons such as reported in [14] and not power analyzer one versus power analyzer two. Figures 1-2 show measurements taken at the output of a VFD operating on a 20hp motor.…”
Section: H Limitations Of Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Although the heat dissipation of a component can be easily calculated by voltage times current, there is often large error in the electrical method due to the probes delays, phase shifts between sampling channels, sampling errors, nonlinearities of converter, and digital instruments sensitive to noise. [3,4] Calorimetric measurement method [5][6][7] is considered to be an efficient method to measure heat dissipation from a standalone electric device such as magnetic component, capacitor, power converter and transformer, etc. The dissipated power is measured as heat by heat flux sensors when the test chamber reaches thermal equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%