2009
DOI: 10.4141/cjas09012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of canola and mustard presscake from biodiesel production as protein sources for growing cattle

Abstract: McKinnon, J. J. and Walker, A. M. 2009. Comparison of canola and mustard presscake from biodiesel production as protein sources for growing cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 89: 401Á408. Two studies were conducted to examine in situ rumen degradation kinetics of biodiesel presscake from canola (CPC) (Brassica napa) and mustard (MPC) (Brassica hirta) relative to regular canola meal (CM) and to compare the performance of cattle fed these meals as protein supplements in backgrounding diets. In the in situ trial CPC and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to our knowledge nothing has been published in terms of field studies with oilseed meals as sources of N for potatoes. The crude protein concentration of mechanically extracted soybean, canola, and mustard meals are reported to be 48%, 39%, and 36%, respectively, on a dry matter basis (7,10). The crude fiber content is less than 13% for canola and less than 7% for soybean (7); therefore, these materials appear to have potential as N sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to our knowledge nothing has been published in terms of field studies with oilseed meals as sources of N for potatoes. The crude protein concentration of mechanically extracted soybean, canola, and mustard meals are reported to be 48%, 39%, and 36%, respectively, on a dry matter basis (7,10). The crude fiber content is less than 13% for canola and less than 7% for soybean (7); therefore, these materials appear to have potential as N sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crude fiber content is less than 13% for canola and less than 7% for soybean (7); therefore, these materials appear to have potential as N sources. There is increasing interest in use of mechanically extracted seed meals as sources of N, partly because of the nascent development of small‐scale processing of oilseeds [e.g., (10,17)], and partly because seed meals store well, are relatively uniform in composition with low C:N ratios, and have better handling characteristics than some other forms of organic N (e.g. fish processing waste) making their use attractive to some growers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent constraints introduced by the Nitrate Directive (European Commission 1991) and the increasing market price of soybean products are forcing farmers to consider the use of low-protein diets (Dal Maso et al 2009;Schiavon et al 2010Schiavon et al , 2012 and alternative protein sources (McKinnon and Walker 2009). Recent work conducted on double-muscled Piemontese bulls evidenced as a reduction in dietary crude protein (CP) concentration in dry matter (DM) from 147 to 108 g kg (1 did not influence DM intake, total volatile fatty acids concentration in the rumen fluid, nutrient digestibility, average daily gain or nitrogen retention (Schiavon et al 2010(Schiavon et al , 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, an increasing number of farms have also introduced small-sized equipment for mechanical extraction of oil from rapeseed, to produce homemade expellers. In this case seeds are usually pressed at moderate temperatures (B1008C) using the procedure of ''cold-pressing'', as it uses only the heat generated from seed crushing (McKinnon and Walker 2009). After extraction, the oil is used as fuel for tractors, whereas residual expellers are recycled as protein and fat supplements for animal feeding, to the economic and environmental benefit of local farmers (Baquero et al 2010;Esteban et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation