2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of CFD–DEM heat transfer simulations with infrared/visual measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A threshold value of 0.32 (converted image intensity from 0-1, where 0 and 1 indicate the minimum and maximum, respectively) can be used to differentiate between the particles and the background. As reported by [17], this value can be found by trial and error. However, by using this method for each particle in the bed, a small halo of pixels with a higher temperature than the surroundings is observed.…”
Section: Ir Counts [-]mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A threshold value of 0.32 (converted image intensity from 0-1, where 0 and 1 indicate the minimum and maximum, respectively) can be used to differentiate between the particles and the background. As reported by [17], this value can be found by trial and error. However, by using this method for each particle in the bed, a small halo of pixels with a higher temperature than the surroundings is observed.…”
Section: Ir Counts [-]mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1 helps to limit the heat loss through conduction to the environment. PMMA can also reduce the interference relate to an increase of the temperature of the back plate during the experiments (C p = 1466 J/ kg/K) compared to the aluminum plate (k = 205 W/m/K and C p = 900 J/kg/K) used in the earlier work of [17]. Particles are heated-up due to the heat of adsorption, while the whole column also increases its temperature from room temperature.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations