2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of commercially-available preservatives for maintaining the integrity of bacterial DNA in human milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCR was conducted using 96‐well plates (USA Scientific, Ocala, FL). The reaction mix was comprised of 12.5 μL Q5® Hot Start High‐Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs®, Inc., Ipswich, MA), 0.25 μL each of forward and reverse primers (27F and 534R, respectively; Carrothers et al, ; Frank et al, ; Lackey et al, ), 2 μL template DNA, and 8 μL nuclease‐free, sterile water to bring the first reaction volume to 23 μL. For each plate, 2 μL of nuclease‐free water was used as a negative control; 2 μL of Escherichia coli DNA (221 ng/mL) was used as a positive control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR was conducted using 96‐well plates (USA Scientific, Ocala, FL). The reaction mix was comprised of 12.5 μL Q5® Hot Start High‐Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs®, Inc., Ipswich, MA), 0.25 μL each of forward and reverse primers (27F and 534R, respectively; Carrothers et al, ; Frank et al, ; Lackey et al, ), 2 μL template DNA, and 8 μL nuclease‐free, sterile water to bring the first reaction volume to 23 μL. For each plate, 2 μL of nuclease‐free water was used as a negative control; 2 μL of Escherichia coli DNA (221 ng/mL) was used as a positive control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants hand expressed milk (∼15 mL) into sterile containers, and a representative aliquot of milk (∼2 mL) was chemically preserved with Milk Preservation Solution (Norgen Biotek Corporation, Thorold, ON) in a 1:1 ratio. Previous work has shown that this is an appropriate method to preserve the bacterial community structure of milk samples for 2–4 weeks (Lackey et al, ). Preserved milk samples remained in ambient temperature (regional mean temperature = 25°C [Bahuchet, ]; ranging from approximately 16–35°C) for up to 4 weeks, after which they were shipped on dry ice to Washington State University, and then stored at −20°C upon arrival.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, DNA from 0.5 mL of preserved milk was extracted using the Milk DNA Preservation and Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corporation), including an additional 2 h lysozyme lysis (20 mg/mL) targeting Gram‐positive genera as described previously for preserved samples (Lackey et al, ). We also included a negative control of nuclease‐free water with each set of samples that were extracted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it has been shown that storage temperatures such as freezing at −80 • C had no significant impact on the microbial composition of faecal samples when compared to fresh samples, further investigations are needed to determine how storage temperature influences the microbiome of milk [286]. The addition of different commercially available preservation solutions to preserve the microbiota in milk was investigated by Lackey et al, with some solutions maintaining the bacterial communities and diversity in milk [287]. Moreover, different DNA extraction methods are shown to substantially influence the milk microbiome, showing the importance of how different methodologies introduce variability in the milk microbiome, which is apparent across many studies [204].…”
Section: Future Of Breast Milk Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%