2016
DOI: 10.1177/0021998316675945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of composite damage growth tools for static behavior of notched composite laminates

Abstract: This paper provides overall comparisons of the static results of an Air Force Research Laboratory exploration into the state of the art of existing technology in composite progressive damage analysis. In this study, blind and re-calibration bench-marking exercises were performed using nine different composite progressive damage analysis codes on unnotched and notched (open-hole) composite coupons under both static and fatigue loading. This paper summarizes the results of the static portion of this program. Com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static benchmarking exercise was described in detail in previous publications. [1][2][3] For the static portion of the program, the analysis teams performed progressive damage blind predictions on unnotched and open-hole coupon failures in both tension and compression. Across all teams, the overall average difference between the blind strength predictions and the mean experimental strength was found to be 18%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static benchmarking exercise was described in detail in previous publications. [1][2][3] For the static portion of the program, the analysis teams performed progressive damage blind predictions on unnotched and open-hole coupon failures in both tension and compression. Across all teams, the overall average difference between the blind strength predictions and the mean experimental strength was found to be 18%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to reverse engineer the constituent properties from macro-scale experimental results. This was extensively used in the recent composite failure prediction benchmark organized by the Air Force Research Laboratory [26,27] where several participants calibrated the constituent properties on the available experimental data [28,29]. 25 Note that, although the reverse engineering approach is promising, it can only be used to estimate the properties of the constituent fibres and matrix in micro-scale models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The necessity for several adjustment and calibrations also made the reliability of the results debatable. 19 According to the available literature, 1722 these methods still need to be matured to provide reliable predictions for variable amplitude fatigue failure incidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%