Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.1994.415401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of detection methods: application to K-complex detection in sleep EEG

Abstract: Detection of a particular event with a known pattern in a noisy signal is the subject of this paper. The purpose is to compare three events detection methods based on matched filtering, decomposition in a set of orthonormal functions and wavelets analysis. The application which is considered here concerns K-complex detection in sleep EEG signals.I. INTRODUCTION The electrical activity of the human brain has been studied extensively since the discovery of the EEG by BERGER in 1924 [l]. In EEG analysis, K-comple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each record was presented to the system for an Accept (as a K-complex) or Reject decision. This test was similar to the testing done in other reported work [3,4]. b. On-Line K Complex Detection.…”
Section: Work Course and Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each record was presented to the system for an Accept (as a K-complex) or Reject decision. This test was similar to the testing done in other reported work [3,4]. b. On-Line K Complex Detection.…”
Section: Work Course and Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Some did not test the algorithm on real data [3] and some did not report quantitative results [4]. Bankman et al [5] used a neural network with 14 features extracted from the EEG as input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average F-score of 0.70 and 0.57% for the detection of the sleep spindles and the k-complexes were achieved, respectively. Another study was presented by Henry et al (1994), in which the k-complexes were classified based on matched filtering. Each segment was decomposed into a set of orthonormal functions and wavelets analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex K may occur both spontaneously (unevoked) and under the influence of external stimuli. Complex K features a frequency support between 0.5-1.5 Hz for the first peak and 5-10 Hz for the second peak and distinguishes itself by the high amplitude (65μV) of the wave shape of the background electroencephalogram of stage 2 (2,3). The importance of detecting complex K is due to the significance it hast for prognosis and diagnosis…”
Section: Electroencephalogram (Eeg)mentioning
confidence: 99%