2007
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of developmental trajectories for place and cued navigation in the morris water task

Abstract: Previous studies investigating the development of place and cued learning using the Morris water task are in disagreement regarding the day in development that each type of learning emerges. Here, place and cued navigation in the water task were examined in differently aged groups of young male and female rats (P17, P18, P19, P20, and P24) during a single day of training. When only distal cues were present, P20 and P24 but not younger rats learned the location of the hidden platform. In contrast, when a proxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings are also consistent with the rodent literature demonstrating age-related improvements in acquisition (reduced escape latency and shorter swim distances) and retention (more time spent in goal quadrant), observed from adolescence to adulthood (Akers et al, 2007; Carman et al, 2001). Specifically, spatial navigation abilities emerge very early in rat development (i.e., generally around postnatal days 19–22) (Carman et al, 2001; Carman et al, 2002; Castro et al, 1987; Akers et al, 2007; Brown et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present findings are also consistent with the rodent literature demonstrating age-related improvements in acquisition (reduced escape latency and shorter swim distances) and retention (more time spent in goal quadrant), observed from adolescence to adulthood (Akers et al, 2007; Carman et al, 2001). Specifically, spatial navigation abilities emerge very early in rat development (i.e., generally around postnatal days 19–22) (Carman et al, 2001; Carman et al, 2002; Castro et al, 1987; Akers et al, 2007; Brown et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, spatial navigation abilities emerge very early in rat development (i.e., generally around postnatal days 19–22) (Carman et al, 2001; Carman et al, 2002; Castro et al, 1987; Akers et al, 2007; Brown et al, 2000). Overall, preweanling rats have been shown to successfully learn to navigate to the platform in place and cued versions of the WMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies agree that the visually cued version of the task can be solved 1–2 days earlier during development than the hidden platform version [102,103,105], with the earliest evidence of learning (assessed by reduced escape latencies) being observed at P17 [103,105,107]. (Though note that one study failed to find evidence of this, with both place and visually cued learning emerging in parallel at P19 [104]).…”
Section: The Development Of Spatial Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, rats at PD 16 showed no significant difference in latencies to the cued platform whether it was in the same location in the pool or room, whereas all rats PD 17 or older displayed the adult pattern of outcomes, first erroneously swimming to the previous position relative to the pool walls, as guided by its orientation relative to the room. Most studies indicate that the emergence of place navigation in rats begins between PD 20–22 (review: Akers and Hamilton, 2007) which is generally taken to reflect the maturation of the hippocampus, supported by upstream sensory and cognitive systems involved in navigation. The observations of Akers et al (2011) are consistent with the hypothesis that distal cues control orientation, but not precise position, very early in development, at the same time that HD cells are maturing functionally, prior to the appearance of mature place cell and grid cell responses.…”
Section: Development Of Brain Representations Of the Environment And mentioning
confidence: 99%