2015
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010983.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different platelet count thresholds to guide administration of prophylactic platelet transfusion for preventing bleeding in people with haematological disorders after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation

Abstract: In people with haematological disorders who are thrombocytopenic due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy or HSCT, we found low-quality evidence that a standard trigger level (10 x 10(9)/L) is associated with no increase in the risk of bleeding when compared to a higher trigger level (20 x 10(9)/L or 30 x 10(9)/L). There was low-quality evidence that a standard trigger level is associated with a decreased number of transfusion episodes when compared to a higher trigger level (20 x 10(9)/L or 30 x 10(9)/L).Findings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 213 publications
(406 reference statements)
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, it has been reported that up to twothirds of all platelet (PLT) transfusions are administered to hematologic patients, including patients with nonmalignant conditions. 1 At the same time, there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials investigating the optimal use of red blood cells (RBCs) in hematologic malignancies. 2 There is also limited understanding of how transfusion patterns vary between different hematologic malignancies and between different age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it has been reported that up to twothirds of all platelet (PLT) transfusions are administered to hematologic patients, including patients with nonmalignant conditions. 1 At the same time, there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials investigating the optimal use of red blood cells (RBCs) in hematologic malignancies. 2 There is also limited understanding of how transfusion patterns vary between different hematologic malignancies and between different age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part 2 of the in silico trials, the lower thrombocyte limit was set to 50*10 9 cells/l (part 1: 193*10 9 cells/l since platelet counts ≥ 50*10 9 cells/l typically do not lead to clinical interventions, for instance, prophylactic platelet transfusions are recommended for thrombocyte counts of ≤ 10*10 9 cells/l [67]. The upper vorinostat dose limit of 3000 mg was defined by two factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low‐dose transfusion strategies lead to an increased number of PC transfusions and an increased number of PCs per patient . The consequences of such strategies in terms of transfusion reactions, the development of human WBC antibodies, and cost are still unknown …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29] The consequences of such strategies in terms of transfusion reactions, the development of human WBC antibodies, and cost are still unknown. 30 Patients with anaphylactic reactions to transfusion require washed PCs. In our study, platelet washing had a major influence on CCI and TI criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%