2006
DOI: 10.1080/02786820600844093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Exhaust Particle Number Measured by EEPS, CPC, and ELPI

Abstract: An Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer (EEPS) Spectrometer, a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC) and an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) were used to determine the exhaust particle number of a Diesel engine on steady speeds and on the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), upstream and downstream several Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). In order to obtain different particle numbers, five DPFs with different porosity were used. The above three instruments give quite similar total particle numbers on steady speed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on reference SMPS measurements, the distribution is a unimodal with a GMD of 52 nm. This GMD is consistent with previous studies (Harris and Maricq 2001;Zervas and Dorlhene 2006) and suggests that the majority of the particles are accumulation mode soot particles with a mass-mobility scaling exponent of approximately 2.2 (Mariq and Xu 2004; Olfert et al 2007). We expect this condition to represent the relative performance of the size distribution methods when measuring diesel exhaust from engines operating on ULSD without DPF aftertreatment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on reference SMPS measurements, the distribution is a unimodal with a GMD of 52 nm. This GMD is consistent with previous studies (Harris and Maricq 2001;Zervas and Dorlhene 2006) and suggests that the majority of the particles are accumulation mode soot particles with a mass-mobility scaling exponent of approximately 2.2 (Mariq and Xu 2004; Olfert et al 2007). We expect this condition to represent the relative performance of the size distribution methods when measuring diesel exhaust from engines operating on ULSD without DPF aftertreatment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Early developments by Mirme (1994) at Tartu University and Biskos et al (2005), led to the commercialized systems available today, such as the EEPS by TSI and the DMS500 by Cambustion. In recent years, both the EEPS and DMS500 have been widely used for emission measurement and characterization (Liu et al 2005;Rubino et al 2005;Yao et al 2006;Zervas and Dorlhene, 2006;Zheng et al 2012). The two instruments have multiple electrometers downstream of a corona charger to measure size distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 11-to 13-stage Andersen Low Pressure Impactor (ALPI; Yamasaki et al, 2000;Pagels et al, 2005;Vaaraslahti et al, 2005;Zervas and Dorlhene, 2006) has multiple jet impaction plates, similar to the BLPI. These are individually manufactured and calibrated.…”
Section: Impactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…239 A water-based condensation particle counter (CPC; Models 3785 and 3786, TSI, Inc.) 240 -242 has shown similar performance to conventional butanol based-CPCs 243 while avoiding the use of a toxic organic solvent. Fastresponse instruments (e.g., the Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer [EEPS; 10 Hz], the Fast Mobility Particle Sizer [FMPS; 1 sec]) 244,245 have been used for source testing of exhaust emissions. Mohr et al 246 show that fast-response particle measurement methods are feasible for detecting low vehicle emissions with better precision and lower MDLs than gravimetric analysis of integrated samples.…”
Section: Particle Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%