2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of existing plastic collapse load solutions with experimental data for 90° elbows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the influence of chosen yield criterion is more significant then strain hardening exponent. Therefore, as can be seen from the review [20], the limit load solution is presented as a function of component and crack geometry only.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the influence of chosen yield criterion is more significant then strain hardening exponent. Therefore, as can be seen from the review [20], the limit load solution is presented as a function of component and crack geometry only.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiment data for several plastic materials such as steel, copper and aluminum show that Mises yield criterion based results can predict experiment data well compared to other analytical results [56]. Some relevant experiment data for pipe bends can be available in the past literatures [7,57]. Table 2 shows comparison of the estimated FE results by Eqs.…”
Section: Verification Of Fe Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) for different ranges of geometric parameters to get best fit, is closely 0.99. The average error for the range 0.1 l < 0.3 is 2.3% for the percent ovality range 0 < To verify the equation, the experimental collapse loads of Greenstreet taken from Han et al [30] are compared with the present models with ovality as given in Table 2. The ovality of the experimental pipe bend is not clearly known and hence it is not reported.…”
Section: Proposed Collapse Moment Equationsmentioning
confidence: 96%