2005
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187068.92184.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies

Abstract: Pedigrees from 269 patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), including frontotemporal dementia (FTD), FTD with ALS (FTD/ALS), progressive nonfluent aphasia, semantic dementia (SD), corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy were analyzed to determine the degree of heritability of these disorders. FTD/ALS was the most and SD the least heritable subtype. FTLD syndromes appear to have different etiologies and recurrence risks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
209
1
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
209
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously proposed by Goldman et al (2005), subjects were given a "Goldman score" ranging from 1 to 4, where 1 identifies an autosomal dominant family history of dementia, 2 identifies a familial aggregation of 3 or more family members with dementia, 3 identifies 1 other first degree relative with dementia, and 4 identifies no or unknown family history for dementia.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously proposed by Goldman et al (2005), subjects were given a "Goldman score" ranging from 1 to 4, where 1 identifies an autosomal dominant family history of dementia, 2 identifies a familial aggregation of 3 or more family members with dementia, 3 identifies 1 other first degree relative with dementia, and 4 identifies no or unknown family history for dementia.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, 223 probands with FTLD syndromes and 11 individuals with logopenic aphasia lacking a previously identified pathogenic mutation were included in the present screen for the C9ORF72 repeat expansion. Prior to screening, all cases within the cohort were assigned a modified Goldman score as a measure of the extent of family history of the disease (Goldman et al, 2005;Beck et al, 2008;Rohrer et al, 2009). A score of 1 represents an autosomal dominant family history of FTLD or MND; 2 is familial aggregation of three or more family members with dementia; 3 is one other first-degree relative with dementia of young onset (565 years); 3.5 is one other first-degree relative with dementia of onset 465 years of age; and 4 is no or unknown family history.…”
Section: Case Ascertainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The differential diagnosis for FTLD and AD has a potential impact for treatment and prognosis. [2][3][4] Currently available drugs such as the acetylcholinesterase (AchE) inhibitor for treating AD are often ineffective for the treatment of FTLD. 5 Furthermore, FTLD often shares clinical features with AD, whereas AD is often associated with FTLD clinical syndromes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%