2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of frequency, field, and time domain ferromagnetic resonance methods

Abstract: We present vector network analyzer ferromagnetic resonance measurements of epitaxial Fe films having a thickness of 16 monolayers. Our objective is to test the reliability of this novel frequency domain technique with respect to frequency and damping. For this purpose we compare vector network analyzer ferromagnetic resonance to pulsed inductive microwave magnetometry, time resolved magnetooptic Kerr effect (both methods in the time domain), and conventional ferromagnetic resonance (measured in the field domai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, TRMOKE samples a small spot of 100 m size while in FMR, the entire 10 mm 2 sample is placed within the microwave cavity, so inhomogeneous broadening is expected to be more severe in the case of FMR. 23 The smaller values of ␣ obtained by Yilgin et al may in part be due to the different methods used to account for the contribution of inhomogeneous broadening to the FMR linewidth. Also, it should be noted that the beam from the regenerative laser amplifier system may become very slightly divergent or convergent as the alignment of the amplifier is adjusted from day to day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, TRMOKE samples a small spot of 100 m size while in FMR, the entire 10 mm 2 sample is placed within the microwave cavity, so inhomogeneous broadening is expected to be more severe in the case of FMR. 23 The smaller values of ␣ obtained by Yilgin et al may in part be due to the different methods used to account for the contribution of inhomogeneous broadening to the FMR linewidth. Also, it should be noted that the beam from the regenerative laser amplifier system may become very slightly divergent or convergent as the alignment of the amplifier is adjusted from day to day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…22 Differences in damping have been found when direct comparison has been made between different frequency, field and time domain techniques. 23 Time-resolved optical measurements have the advantage that they can probe a much smaller volume than microwave resonance experiments, but may be susceptible to additional contributions to the damping. For example, the spatial profile of a pulsed magnetic field or a focused pump laser spot may lead to the generation of magnons that propagate away from the region that is being probed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dynamic measurements using VNA-FMR spectroscopy, the samples of 1 × 1 cm 2 are coupled to a coplanar waveguide; more details on the experimental set-up can be found in [10]. For the conventional configuration of measurement (see figure 1(c)), the data at each bias field (H 0 ) require the subtraction of two measurements: one with the bias field switched on and a second measurement with a 1 kOe saturating field applied in the same direction as the rf field (h rf ), The developed configuration (longitudinal) was inspired from the longitudinal FMR technique [8,9].…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest frequency excitation corresponds to the gyrotropic mode when the vortex moves as a whole around an equilibrium position [7][8][9], meanwhile the higher frequency modes correspond to the spin waves excited mainly outside of the vortex core [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The spin wave having radial or azimuthal symmetry with respect to the dot center are described by integers (n, m), which indicate number of nodes in the dynamic magnetization along radial (n) and azimuthal (m) directions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%