2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of GC–MS and FTIR methods for quantifying naphthenic acids in water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the estrogen level in the natural water samples, the intensities of IR characteristic peaks that were obtained via the HPLC-FTIR technology were used to calculate contaminant concentration, as previously reported30. First, the best characteristic peak was chosen because of a number of IR peaks in the pure material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the estrogen level in the natural water samples, the intensities of IR characteristic peaks that were obtained via the HPLC-FTIR technology were used to calculate contaminant concentration, as previously reported30. First, the best characteristic peak was chosen because of a number of IR peaks in the pure material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, however, the chemical makeup of the SAGD process water seems to be different from that of tailings pond water (Tables 1 and 3). In a previous study, for example, NA concentrations were significantly higher in SAGD water than in tailings pond water (Scott et al, 2008). Therefore, water treatment in SAGD processes needs to be considered as a separate issue from the management of tailings pond water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given that the SAGD process water in this study contained a significant amount of DOCs (Table 1), compared to all the DOC constituents, NAs identified in this study can be only a small fraction of the organic contaminants that come from Scott et al (2008). d Gulley (1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,5,7 A cromatografia gasosa acoplada à espectrometria de massas (GC/MS -gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) é uma técnica analítica amplamente utilizada para amostras petroquímicas, embora ainda sejam necessárias etapas de isolamento e derivatização dos compostos mais polares. 2,5,[7][8][9][10][11] Contudo, nem sempre ocorre a separação individual dos componentes e, frequentemente, os cromatogramas apresentam as chamadas misturas complexas não resolvidas (UCM -unresolved complex mixtures), as quais tornam a análise muito difícil. Além disso, a extensa fragmentação dos interferentes acíclicos, comuns nos derivados de petróleo e misturas técnicas comerciais de ácidos naftênicos, no espectrômetro de massas, fornece informações limitadas sobre a estrutura e massa molecular dos AN.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified