2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of k-ε models in gaseous release and dispersion simulations using the CFD code FLACS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grid-based resolution in FLACS, unlike other commercial simulation tools, relies on the so-called porosity/distributed resistance (PDR), where sub-grid geometry is represented as area and volume porosities (denoting the degree of "openness" for each grid cell), instead of resolving individual obstacles by a grid. Moen, A. et al [27] conducted a comparative study of k-ε models in impinging hydrogen jet dispersion scenarios using the CFD code FLACS. The simulation results were compared with the Schlieren photographs from experiments in Reference [28].…”
Section: Flacs-hydrogen Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid-based resolution in FLACS, unlike other commercial simulation tools, relies on the so-called porosity/distributed resistance (PDR), where sub-grid geometry is represented as area and volume porosities (denoting the degree of "openness" for each grid cell), instead of resolving individual obstacles by a grid. Moen, A. et al [27] conducted a comparative study of k-ε models in impinging hydrogen jet dispersion scenarios using the CFD code FLACS. The simulation results were compared with the Schlieren photographs from experiments in Reference [28].…”
Section: Flacs-hydrogen Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…m lv represents the interphase mass transfer rate. Previous studies have shown that the Realizable k-ε model has good applicability for the numerical simulation of dense-phase gas-releases [21,22]. Therefore, the turbulence model was set as the Realizable k-ε model in this study.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods to assess the impact of an explosion, such as the Multi-energy method, the TNT equivalent method, the Baker-Strehlow method, and CFD simulations. (van den Berg and Lannoy, 1993;Qiao and Zhang, 2010;Qi et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Horvat, 2018;Moen et al, 2019). The multi-energy method is widely used in the two-dimensional model, which comprehensively considers the turbulence acceleration and gas activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%