Comparison of Lidar-Based and Radar-Based Adaptive Cruise Control Systems

Abstract

for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale. SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of publication. Direct your orders to SAE Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. Quantity reprint rates can be obtained from the Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. To request permission to reprint a technical paper or permission to use copyrighted SAE publications in other works, contact the SAE Publications Group. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Reducing Unnecessary Alerts in Pedestrian Protection Systems Based on P2V Communications

“…Most systems rely on onboard perception sensors such as computer vision and laser scanning (e.g., [4,5]). Both technologies have limitations and strengths [6,7]. Computer vision is especially capable of reconstructing a model of the environment, although problems arise in adverse weather and in changing lighting conditions.…”

Sensor Technologies to Follow Vehicles for ITS

“…It defines distance to an object thanks to laser pulse anid use shorter wavelengths than those in radar (usually near infrared) [23].…”

Identification of Wetness on Millimeter Wave Radar Surface

“…Currently available information regarding the performance degradation due to fog, rain, snow and spray make clear that, automotive radar sensors are much less affected by adverse weather conditions than lidar sensors [8][9][10][11]. These devices are operating in millimeter wave and infrared range respectively, in which their performance may be degraded by adverse weather conditions.…”