2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/782071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Ligation-Mediated PCR Methods in Differentiation ofMycobacterium tuberculosisStrains

Abstract: Fast and inexpensive identification of epidemiological links between limited number of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains is required to initially evaluate hospital outbreaks, laboratory crosscontaminations, and family or small community transmissions. The ligation-mediated PCR methods (LM-PCR) appear sufficiently discriminative and reproducible to be considered as a good candidate for such initial, epidemiological analysis. Here, we compared the discriminative power of the recently developed in our laboratory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, Mtb clinical isolates were compared by means of two LM-PCR methods: FLiP (Reisig, 2005) and FLAP (Zaczek et al, 2014a;2014b) and the obtained results were verified by the "gold" epidemiological standard IS6110-RFLP hybridization technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, Mtb clinical isolates were compared by means of two LM-PCR methods: FLiP (Reisig, 2005) and FLAP (Zaczek et al, 2014a;2014b) and the obtained results were verified by the "gold" epidemiological standard IS6110-RFLP hybridization technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Subsequently, isolates were characterized by IS6110-RFLP typing using internationally standardized protocol (van Embden et al, 1993). The FLAP method was performed as described previously (Zacz ek et al, 2014a;2014b) and the FLiP analysis was performed as originally described by Reisig (Reisig et al, 2005). The fingerprint patterns obtained by these three methods were compared visually with one another and strains were considered identical if their DNA profiles, obtained by all three methods, were the same.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%