IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMs
DOI: 10.1109/omems.2002.1031505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of MEMS variable optical attenuator designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wavelength dependence of the loss (WDL) also increases, from 1.0 dB at 3 dB of attenuation to 6 dB at 30 dB. These values are typical of shutter-insertion VOAs, and could be improved by using the alternative principle of image translation by a moving mirror [9].…”
Section: Index Terms-microelectromechanical Systems (Mems) Microoptomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The wavelength dependence of the loss (WDL) also increases, from 1.0 dB at 3 dB of attenuation to 6 dB at 30 dB. These values are typical of shutter-insertion VOAs, and could be improved by using the alternative principle of image translation by a moving mirror [9].…”
Section: Index Terms-microelectromechanical Systems (Mems) Microoptomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both transmission and reflection VOAs have been reported. [98] The schematics and the SEM of the fabricated device are shown in Fig. 7.36.…”
Section: Optical Attenuator Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of misalignment determines the percentage of attenuation. It has been found that reflector-type VOAs are more promising in comparison to the former type [1]. By including interference, performance of the reflector based VOAs can be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%