2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34123-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Numerical Modelling Methods of Innovative Materials for Ballistic Shields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the material properties of the projectile and the used polymers [55][56][57][58][59] E-Young's modulus; v-Poisson's ratio; r-density was presented in the form of a cubic geometry, which was digitized with solid elements. The interaction between the core and the facings has been assigned to the function "hard" contact.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the material properties of the projectile and the used polymers [55][56][57][58][59] E-Young's modulus; v-Poisson's ratio; r-density was presented in the form of a cubic geometry, which was digitized with solid elements. The interaction between the core and the facings has been assigned to the function "hard" contact.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the composite consists of eight layers of fabrics, holistic modelling was used. Based on this work [19][20][21][22], a model was adopted in which the structure of the shield was simplified, its dimensions were reduced and the conditions of the modeled phenomenon were simplified, for which factors such as temperature, air resistance or rotation of the projectile were not considered.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also noted that the rotational speed of the projectile as a component of the total impact energy had a slight impact on the destruction of the panels, and this was therefore also omitted in the calculations. A constitutive equation with Johnson-Cook destruction was used for all the models [45,46]. This model is the one most used in impact analysis (6):…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%