2007
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2007.904923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Pansharpening Algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion Contest

Abstract: Abstract-In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
372
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 761 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
372
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain better coregistered upscaled images, [18] uses the Induction scaling technique, followed by a new fusion technique called Indusion. Other methods following the same philosophy work in a MRA setting, e.g., ATWT [15,[19][20][21] or with LP representations [16,[22][23][24]. Some recent papers, to avoid improper modeling, recast the problem in an optimization framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain better coregistered upscaled images, [18] uses the Induction scaling technique, followed by a new fusion technique called Indusion. Other methods following the same philosophy work in a MRA setting, e.g., ATWT [15,[19][20][21] or with LP representations [16,[22][23][24]. Some recent papers, to avoid improper modeling, recast the problem in an optimization framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAM [16], ERGAS [5], Q4 [16] cannot be used. Therefore we adopt the QNR metric proposed in [17] to examine the quality of the fused image.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Pansharpening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical pansharpening techniques can be divided into two categories [5]: the component substitution methods [6,7,8] and the multiresolution-analysis methods [9,10]. The component substitution methods first make use of a projection of the upsampled MS images to obtain a better representation of which one component contains most of the image structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-modality aspect considers the whole set of modalities and assesses whether its multimodality properties are close to those of the reference ensemble. Likewise, this protocol takes into account two properties that should be checked for individual modality as well as for the multi-modality set: For assessment of the fusion process results we use the following metrics (Alparone et al, 2007;Thomas and Wald, 2007;Wald, 2002):…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%