2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2017.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Programmable Logic and Setting Group Methods for adaptive overcurrent protection in microgrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this high‐speed ABOP, the logic circuit controlled the backup relay that tripped a three‐phase pole breaker in a radial power system. In fuse relay adaptive overcurrent protection schemes for microgrids with distributed generators, the backup relay settings were selected according to the microgrid circuit paths, and maximum ampere rating fuses on feeder busses, but without using fuse‐switch sensors and logic for the fuse feeders. In future research, the high‐speed ABOP with fuses, sensors, and logic will be modified for using with single‐pole breakers to integrate with nonradial power systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this high‐speed ABOP, the logic circuit controlled the backup relay that tripped a three‐phase pole breaker in a radial power system. In fuse relay adaptive overcurrent protection schemes for microgrids with distributed generators, the backup relay settings were selected according to the microgrid circuit paths, and maximum ampere rating fuses on feeder busses, but without using fuse‐switch sensors and logic for the fuse feeders. In future research, the high‐speed ABOP with fuses, sensors, and logic will be modified for using with single‐pole breakers to integrate with nonradial power systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a fault situation, the maximum phase secondary current of breaker poles was selected to calculate the multiple of pickup (tap), and consequently calculated the relay's operating time to trip the breaker. In adaptive overcurrent protections, relays could be set by using the relay's PSL or resident functions . This high‐speed ABOP on fuse feeders with sensors was based on using the relay's PSL instead of using relay's resident functions.…”
Section: Theory and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The level of fault current, in addition to the selection and coordination of protective devices, are the main challenges of the microgrids incorporated with the wind [110]. Among many solutions adaptive overcurrent protection scheme [116], centralized communication with a localized backup scheme [117], fault distance estimationbased protection scheme [118], fuzzy inference system based scheme [119], microprocessor-based scheme [120], oscillation frequency and transient power-based scheme [121], parameter estimation approach [122], and voltage-currenttime inverse-based scheme [123], are widely used protection schemes.…”
Section: G Protection Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36]- [39], [43]- [46], [51]- [53], [56], [62], [63], [66], [69], [70], [72], [73], [78], [83]- [85], [87]- [89], [99], [100]- [116] Use of power hardware in the loop (PHIL) scheme [17], [49], [36], [81], [52], [67], [91], [112], [114], [117]- [120] Use of Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs) for measurement, monitoring, and control. [19], [28], [49], [42], [43], [84], [54], [88], [61], [75], [97], [98], [101], [71], [121]- [123] Use of power amplifiers to simulate power signals [17],…”
Section: Real-time Simulation Challenges and New Trends For Protectiomentioning
confidence: 99%